Appeal 3259073
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
‘subdivision of site to form separate building plot and associated work including new vehicular access to [site address] ’.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for subdivision of site to form separate building plot and associated work including new vehicular access to [site address] at [site address] , Essex [postcode] . The permission is granted in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 19/01370/FUL, dated 10 September 2019, subject to the conditions included in the Schedule at [name].
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
Despite the description of development above, the proposal includes a three bedroom dwelling on the appeal site.
The Council refers to policies from the Tendring District Local Plan 2013-2033 and [name], and indicates that the Section 1 Local Plan was adopted in January 2021, which is after the appeal was made. However, this contains strategic policies and not those referred to in this case, which are from the Section 2 Plan, which is subject to independent examination. The National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) indicates that weight may be given to relevant policies in emerging plans depending on a number of factors1. I accept that the Section 2 Plan is at a relatively advanced stage in its preparation, but it is not fully clear whether there are unresolved objections to any of the policies and, if so, how significant these are. For this reason, I find that only limited weight can be given to these emerging policies for the purposes of this appeal. Consequently, I have relied on the policies referred to from the adopted development plan. 1 Paragraph 48.
A revised version of the Framework was issued in July 2021. The parties were given the opportunity to comment on any implications with regard to the current appeal and I have had regard to the comments made.
Section 04
[name]
The Council’s third reason for refusal concerns the effects of the proposal on a protected European site and consequently a financial contribution is required to mitigate the likely effects. The appellants submitted a unilateral undertaking as part of the appeal process to address this requirement. However, it is necessary to consider the basis for and adequacy of the undertaking.
Accordingly, the main issues are: • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the street scene; • whether adequate private amenity space would be provided for the new dwelling; and • whether the proposal makes adequate provision towards the mitigation of likely significant effects on a protected European site.
Section 05
Character and Appearance
No [site address] is a two story end-of-terrace dwelling in a predominantly residential area, which includes a mix of property types. No 63 is located on a corner plot next to the junction of [address] with [address] and consequently its garden has a side boundary running along [address]. The proposed dwelling would be sited within the rear part of the garden, on the site of an existing one and half storey building, which is ancillary to the use of No 63.
Policies QL9, QL10 and QL11 of the Tendring District Local Plan 2007 (the Local Plan) seek to ensure that all new development makes a positive contribution to the quality of the local environment and character by ensuring that proposals are well-designed, relate satisfactorily to their setting and are of a suitable scale, mass and form.
The proposed dwelling and its driveway would be partly sited on the footprint of the existing building, which is not insignificant in terms of its scale and prominence in the street scene. The small dwelling would be larger but would not appear cramped or otherwise incongruous in the residential setting, particularly as its siting and orientation would respect the established layout of dwellings along [address]. The design of the building, while simple, is not dissimilar in terms of the pitched roof with gable ends to the two neighbouring properties on [address]. 10.The dwelling and driveway would result in the loss of part of the rear garden and some vegetation. This would be most apparent along the [address] frontage where a new driveway for the dwelling together with parallel parking spaces to serve No 63 would create openings in the existing verdant boundary. However, such openings are characteristic along the street and surrounding streets and the gaps created would represent only a partial loss of the green boundary that wraps around the garden area of No 63. Indeed, the most 2 prominent part of garden boundary is to the front of No 63 and directly next to the road junction, which would be retained. Moreover, the remaining frontage of the appeal site and garden for the new dwelling could be enhanced with additional planting as suggested by the Council through a landscaping condition. 11.Therefore, taking these findings as a whole, I conclude that the proposed development would not result in material harm to the character and appearance of the appeal site and the street scene. Therefore, it is not contrary to Policies QL9, QL10 and QL11 of the Local Plan, as described above. Provision of [name] 12.Policy HG9 of the Local Plan sets out private amenity space standards for new residential development, which in this case for a three bedroom dwelling should be a minimum of [address] metres. The provision for the new dwelling is [address] metres with [address] metres remaining available to No 63. This very limited shortfall should not count against the proposal and I note that the Council’s principal concern is the configuration of the space, with some to the front and side and, therefore, whether it would be private. 13.The supporting text to Policy HG9 acknowledges that side gardens can contribute to private amenity space where of appropriate depth and adequately screened. It appears that the position of the side and front garden areas for the new dwelling could be adequately screened to maintain an appropriate level of privacy. Moreover, there are examples in the surrounding area of established and recently permitted dwellings where the main garden area is to the side rather than rear. Therefore, there would be no material harm arising from the proposed dwelling in this regard and I conclude as such. Consequently, there is no conflict with the provisions of Policy HG9 of the Local Plan, as described. Effect on a [name] site 14.The site is within the [name] and [name] (RAMS) zone of influence. The Essex Coast RAMS sets out the detailed mitigation measures that are to be delivered from the RAMS tariff related to the likely effects of residential development on a number of protected European sites. The relevant regulations require that if likely significant effects on a protected site cannot be excluded, then the competent authority must undertake an appropriate assessment of the implications for that site2. 15.The Council undertook an appropriate assessment using the Natural England standard approach. The proposal is assessed as having likely effects on the [name] and Special Protection Area (SPA) resulting from increased recreational disturbance, in combination with other schemes. Consequently, a tariff contribution for the single dwelling is required to mitigate the effects. 16.In these circumstances, I have relied on the appropriate assessment already undertaken by the Council and agree that a contribution is necessary to mitigate the likely effects in accordance with the [name]. Therefore, 2 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017, Regulation 63. 3 the contribution meets the requisite statutory tests as set out in the Framework3. 17.The appellants have provided an undertaking to address the required contribution, which includes the appropriate amount related to a single dwelling and which provides means of securing this contribution related to the development proposed. As such, I conclude that the proposal makes adequate provision towards the mitigation of likely significant effects on a protected European site. Therefore, there is no conflict with Policy EN6 concerning the effects of development on biodiversity or Policy EN11a concerning protection of international sites, both of the Local Plan.
Section 06
Schedule – conditions
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: site location plan and IWW-02.
All new driveways and parking areas shall be made of porous materials, or provision shall be made to direct run-off water from the hard surface to a permeable or porous area or surface within the curtilage of the dwelling.
Prior to occupation of the dwelling a 1.5 metre x 1.5 metre pedestrian visibility splay, as measured from and along the highway boundary, shall be provided on both sides of the new vehicular access for [site address] . Such visibility splays shall be retained free of any obstruction in perpetuity. These visibility splays must not form part of the vehicular surface of the access.
No unbound material shall be used in the surface treatment of the new or existing vehicular access or driveway.
Prior to occupation of the new dwelling the new vehicular access for [site address] shall be constructed at right angles to the highway boundary and to the existing carriageway. The width of the access at its junction with the highway shall not be more than 4.5 metres (5 low kerbs), shall be retained at that width for 6 metres within the site and shall be provided with an appropriate dropped kerb vehicular crossing of the footway/highway verge. 6 In accordance with The Town and Country Planning (Pre-Commencement Conditions) Regulations 2018. 7 Paragraph 56. 5
There shall be no discharge of surface water onto the Highway.
Any new boundary planting shall be planted a minimum of 1 metre back from the highway boundary and any visibility splay.
Each vehicular parking space shall have minimum dimensions of 2.9 metres x 5.5 metres.
No above ground works shall take place until there has been submitted to and approved, in writing, by the Local Planning Authority a scheme of hard and soft landscaping works for the site, which shall include all boundary treatments and any proposed changes in ground levels and also accurately identify spread, girth and species of all existing trees, shrubs and hedgerows on the site and indicate any to be retained, together with measures for their protection which shall comply with the recommendations set out in the British Standards Institute publication "BS 5837: 2012 - Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction."
All changes in ground levels, hard landscaping, planting, seeding or turfing shown on the approved landscaping details shall be carried out during the first planting and seeding season (October - March inclusive) following the commencement of the development or in such other phased arrangement as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or shrubs which, within a period of 5 years of being planted die, are removed or seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the Local Planning Authority agrees in writing to a variation of the previously approved details.
Notwithstanding the provisions of [name], B, C, D and E of Schedule 2, Part 1 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or the equivalent provisions of any order revoking and re-enacting that Order), the dwelling hereby permitted shall not be extended or ancillary buildings or structures erected within its curtilage without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority following the submission of a planning application.
The following [name] shall be implemented and adhered to throughout the full demolition and construction period for the development hereby permitted: (i) Demolition or construction works shall take place only between 08:00 to 18:00 Monday to Friday and 08:00 to 13:00 Saturdays. Deliveries will be accepted within these working hour periods except for Public/[name]. No works of any kind shall take place on Sundays or any Public/[name]. No vehicle connected with the works shall arrive on site before 07:30 or leave after 19:00 (except in the case of emergency). (ii) All loading and unloading of material will take place on the site whenever possible so as not to obstruct traffic. (iii) On-site parking will be available for contractors at all times. (iv) The perimeters of the site will be fenced off with Heras fencing. The fence to the front boundary will be fitted with gates which will be secured when the site is vacated. Appropriate safety notices will be displayed. A secure 6 compound for the storage of materials will be formed on the site and will be used for such storage. (v) Wheel washing facilities will be made available on site and all vehicles will be checked and washed down as necessary before leaving the site to minimise any site debris being transferred onto the Highway. Regular inspection of the adjacent road will be carried out to ensure that no debris is inadvertently spread on to the Highway. Edges of roads and footpaths will be cleaned using hand broom with controlled damping. (vi) The contractors will seek to monitor and control the effects of dust on site during the construction process and to consider the proximity of dust sensitive properties in the vicinity of the works. A water supply will be made available for damping down and fine materials such as sand and cementitious products will be stored under cover or in sealed containers. Covers will be put on to skips that contain dusty material before leaving site. No materials produced as a result of the site development or clearance shall be burned on site. (vii) [name] - The selection and use of machinery to operate on site, and working practices to be adopted will, as a minimum requirement, be compliant with the standards laid out in [name] 5228:2014. Mobile plant to be resident on site during extended works shall be fitted with non-audible reversing alarms (subject to HSE agreement). Prior to the commencement of any piling works a rationale and details of the techniques to be employed for the piling method shall be chosen, which aim to minimise noise and vibration to nearby residents. (viii) All site operatives and sub-contractors shall be made aware of their requirement to assist in the implementation of these requirements and to work to the following best practice measures: General guide to the prevention of pollution; Works in, near or liable to affect watercourses; and Working at demolition and construction sites (Environment Agency). [End of Schedule] 7
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 154No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 13 September 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 28 July 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3259073
- Application reference
- 19/01370/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Tendring District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000076
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Minor Dwellings
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0.1 hectares
- Floor space
- 110 m²
- Number of residences
- 1
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 8 September 2020
- Valid date
- 29 September 2020
- Start date
- 18 December 2020
- Planning authority decision date
- 19 March 2020
- Appeal decision date
- 13 September 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 3027
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25