Appeal 3264407
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
11 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
erection of 35 dwelling houses. This decision is issued in accordance with Section 56(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) and supersedes the decision issued on 13 May 2021.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of 35 dwelling houses on [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/20/0864/FUL, dated 6 April 2020, and the documents and plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions included in the schedule to this
Section 03
Procedural Matters
An application for costs was made by Barkby Real Estate Limited against Uttlesford District Council. This application is the subject of a separate
Section 04
Decision.
The appeal has been submitted with a [name] dated 16 March
This includes obligations in respect of the provision of capital moneys towards education, health and 7No. affordable housing units. I address this matter later in this decision.
Section 05
Main Issue
Whether or not the inclusion of a policy compliant amount of affordable housing would be viable.
Section 06
Reasons
The appeal site comprises part of a former cement works. It has the benefit of 3 planning permissions, one of which was an outline scheme for 8 blocks of live/work units1. This permission was partially implemented with the erection of 2 blocks.
Outline permission was granted in 2017 for a residential development for up to 49 dwellings2. A reserved matters permission for part of the scheme for 35 dwellings (21 market homes and 14 affordable dwellings) was approved3.
The appeal scheme replicates that submitted in respect of the approved reserved matters but instead of 14 affordable units includes 7units. The under provision of affordable units is the only issue between the parties.
The Council do not contest the method and assumptions which underpin the appellants valuation apart from those which underpin the benchmark values (BM) which are a principal component of the site’s existing use value (EUV). The appellants have modelled the EUV on the extant scheme for the live work units.
The basis of the Council’s decision reflects its concerns that live/work units have proved an unpopular form of development with increasing numbers of such units within the permitted scheme now converted to dwellings.
The appellant’s purchase price for the site was based on the extant permission and reflects the viability decisions they faced. Furthermore, the appellant has followed published Guidance on this matter4 given the extant permission. On this basis the valuation based on live work units is not obsolete as the Council states. The Council has not suggested an alternative approach to this matter.
I acknowledge that the Council’s Policy H9, requiring the inclusion of affordable housing, is consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework). However the policy recognises that affordable housing will be negotiated on a site by site basis allowing for variables including site conditions. This is what the appellants have sought to do through negotiation. The proposal is not therefore in conflict with this policy.
The approach adopted is consistent with Paragraph 57 of the Framework.
Section 07
[name]
A Section 106 agreement has been submitted with the appeal. This includes contributions towards education, health and affordable housing. A Community Infrastructure Compliance (CIL) Schedule submitted by the Council identifies the policy basis for each of the items included in the agreement.
Overall, the obligations included are related to the requirements of development plan policies and are necessary, directly related and fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed scheme in line with paragraph 56 of the Framework.
Section 08
Interested parties
The original outline permission for the development of the whole site was accompanied by a transport assessment which indicated that the adjoining 1 UTT/1382/01/FUL 2 UTT/16/1444/OP 3 UTT/17/3038/DFO 4 Planning Practice Guidance highway would have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed scheme.
Section 09
Conclusions
Saved Policy H9 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005 requires that affordable housing is negotiated on a site by site basis. The viability evidence demonstrates that a policy compliant provision would render the whole scheme unviable. For this reason, the appeal scheme does not conflict with Saved Policy H9 of the Uttlesford Local Plan 2005 and the appeal is allowed.
Section 10
Conditions
I have considered the list of suggested conditions supplied by the Council and have made changes in line with the Guidance.
I have imposed conditions in respect of the time limits and the approved plans for reasons of certainty. A condition has been imposed regarding the surface water drainage across the site to minimise the potential for flooding.
Conditions in respect of materials, landscaping and surface materials are required to ensure the character and appearance of the proposed development responds appropriately to its immediate context. For the same reason, I have included a condition regarding the general a relationship between dwellings in order to protect the character and appearance of streetscene within the site.
I have imposed a biodiversity enhancement strategy in order to minimise the impacts of the proposed scheme on areas of biodiversity and to protect priority species.
Conditions have been imposed in respect of surveys for land contamination given the recent history of this site. A condition requiring appropriate remediation, in the event of contamination being discovered has been imposed as well. A further condition has been imposed, to ensure that if, in the event the discovery of further contamination, appropriate measures can be taken to the protect health of surrounding and future occupiers.
I have imposed a condition requiring the parking spaces, serving each dwelling to be fully completed in advance of them being occupied in order to prevent overspill parking into surrounding highways which could prejudice highway safety.
I have imposed a standard condition in respect of a travel pack of information in order to encourage future occupiers to use public transport and other means of sustainable transport. I have imposed a condition to ensure that the dwellings hereby approved are fully accessible for all occupiers. For the same reasons, conditions requiring the completion of cycle parking in advance of the dwellings hereby permitted being provided and the inclusion within the scheme of a single electric charging point have been imposed.
In order to protect the health and well being of surrounding occupiers and ensure highway safety, I have imposed a condition requiring a construction method statement. This requires a range of matters to ensure that adequate controls are agreed in advance of construction proceeding.
Section 11
Schedule of Conditions
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 90416.01; 90416.02; 90416.03; 90416.04; 90416.05; 90416.06; 90416.07; 90416.08; 90416.09; 90416.10; 90416.11; 90416.12; 90416.13; 90416.14; 90416.15 [name]; 90416.16 [name]; 90416.17 [name]; 90416.18 [name]; 90416.19 [name]; 90416.20; 90416.21; 90416.22; 90416.23; 90416.24; 90416.25; 90416.26 [name]; 90416.30 [name]; 90416.31 [name]; 90416.32 [name]; 90416.33 [name]; 90416.34 [name]; 90416.35 [name]; 90416.40.
Prior to commencement of the development, details of the following hard and soft landscaping works must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority: • Retained features • New planting • Hard surfaces • Boundary treatment • External lighting • Pedestrian and cycle access to PROW byway 18 ( [site address] ) All hard and soft landscape works must be carried out in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation of the thirty-fifth dwelling. All planting, seeding or turfing and soil preparation comprised in the above details of landscaping must be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the buildings, the completion of the development, or in agreed phases whichever is the sooner, and any plants which within a period of five years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased must be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species, unless the local planning authority gives written consent to any variation. All landscape works must be carried out in accordance with the guidance contained in [name], unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority.
The dwellings in the proposed development shall not be occupied until such time as their associated vehicle parking areas indicated on the approved plans (90416.30 [name]), has been hard surfaced, sealed and marked out in parking bays. The vehicle parking shall not be used for any purpose other than the parking of vehicles that are related to the use of the development unless otherwise agreed with the Local Planning Authority.
The cycle parking facilities as shown in principle on drawing number 90416.33 [name] are to be provided prior to the first occupation of the dwellings which they serve, they shall be secure, convenient, covered and retained thereafter.
Prior to slab level of the development hereby approved a biodiversity enhancement strategy for protected and Priority species shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The content of the [name] shall include the following: a) Purpose and conservation objectives for the proposed enhancement measures; b) detailed designs to achieve stated objectives; c) locations of proposed enhancement measures by appropriate maps and plans; d) persons responsible for implementing the enhancement measures; e) details of initial aftercare and long-term maintenance (where relevant). The works shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details and shall be retained in that manner thereafter.
Each dwelling hereby permitted must not be occupied until such time as its associated vehicle parking area has been developed and provided in accordance with [name]. 90416.30 [name].
The eaves and ridge heights of the permitted dwellings relative to each other and to existing buildings must be constructed as shown on the following drawings: • [name]. 90416.40 • [name]. 90416.26 [name]
Prior to the construction of the development hereby approved above slab level a scheme for on-site foul and surface water drainage works, including connection point and discharge rate, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
A minimum of a single electric vehicle charging point shall be installed at each of the houses. These shall be provided, fully wired and connected, ready to use before first occupation.
No development shall commence until an assessment of the risks posed by any contamination shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. This assessment must be undertaken by a suitably qualified contaminated land practitioner, in accordance with [name] 10175: Investigation of potentially contaminated sites - Code of Practice and the Environment Agency’s Model Procedures for the Management of [name] (CLR 11) (or equivalent [name] and [name] if replaced), and shall assess any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The assessment shall include: i) a survey of the extent, scale and nature of contamination; ii) the potential risks to: • human health; • property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes; • adjoining land; • ground waters and surface waters; • ecological systems; and • archaeological sites and ancient monuments.
No development shall take place where (following the risk assessment) land affected by contamination is found which poses risks identified as unacceptable in the risk assessment, until a detailed remediation scheme shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The scheme shall include an appraisal of remediation options, identification of the preferred option(s), the proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, and a description and programme of the works to be undertaken including the verification plan. The remediation scheme shall be sufficiently detailed and thorough to ensure that upon completion the site will not qualify as contaminated land under [name] of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to its intended use. The approved remediation scheme shall be carried out [and upon completion a verification report by a suitably qualified contaminated land practitioner shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority] before the development [or relevant phase of development] is occupied.
Any contamination that is found during the course of construction of the approved development that was not previously identified shall be reported immediately to the local planning authority. Development on the part of the site affected shall be suspended and a risk assessment carried out and submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Where unacceptable risks are found remediation and verification schemes shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. These approved schemes shall be carried out before the development is resumed or continued.
The dwellings hereby approved shall be built to Category 2: Accessible and adaptable dwellings M4(2) of the Building Regulations 2010 [name], Volume 1 2015 edition.
Prior to occupation of the proposed development, the Developer shall be responsible for the provision and implementation of a [name] for sustainable transport, approved by Essex County Council.
No development shall take place, including any works of demolition, until a [name] has been submitted to, and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The Statement shall provide for: i) The construction programme and phasing ii) Hours of operation and delivery; iii) Details of any proposed piling operations including a vibration impact assessment together with suggested mitigation measures; iv) the parking of vehicles of site operatives and visitors; v) loading and unloading of plant and materials; vi) storage of plant and materials used in constructing the development; vii) the erection and maintenance of security hoarding including decorative displays and facilities for public viewing, where appropriate; viii) wheel and underbody washing facilities; ix) measures to control the emission of dust, noise and odours and dirt during construction; x) a scheme for recycling/disposing of waste resulting from demolition and construction works; xi) delivery, demolition and construction working hours. The approved [name] shall be adhered to throughout the construction period for the development.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Costs Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 340No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 13 May 2021Differs from the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 24 March 2021 (page 1)
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 340No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 12 July 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 24 March 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3264407
- Application reference
- UTT/20/0864/FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000077
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Major dwellings
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- 0.94 hectares
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 35
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 3 December 2020
- Valid date
- 22 December 2020
- Start date
- 1 February 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Appeal decision date
- 12 July 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 527
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25