Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3264840

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

10 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as the “erection of 2 detached dwellings with garages following demolition of existing bungalow”.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of 2 detached dwellings with garages following demolition of existing bungalow at [site address] , Suffolk [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/20/2805/FUL, dated 23 July 2020, subject to the conditions on the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    Since the submission of the appellant’s appeal the Revised National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) was published and came into force on 20 July 2021. In light of this I have sought the views of the main parties in writing and I have taken subsequent responses into account in reaching my

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues in this appeal are the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on [name] sites.

  4. Section 05

    Character and Appearance

    The appeal site contains a detached bungalow which is set back within its grounds, with parking and turning areas to the front and a private garden area to the rear. The layout of the site follows the mainly linear pattern of development along [address], which is primarily residential in character.

    The proposal seeks to demolish the existing bungalow and erect two detached dwellings, both to be provided with detached garaging to the front of the properties and private garden areas to the rear. [address] is quite lengthy, with most properties comprising detached dwellings that are set back from the road. Some of these properties benefit from garaging within the front garden area, with others developed in close proximity to one another.

    The proposed dwellings would be detached, thereby following the form of the vast majority of properties along [address]. Adequate spacing to the side boundaries and between the properties would be provided so that the dwellings need not appear cramped within its individual plot or the site as a whole. Given the length of the driveway areas, I am satisfied that the positioning of the proposed garaging to the front of the properties would not be particularly noticeable within the street scene, nor would they erode or harm the existing form of development that exists in the vicinity of the appeal site.

    Consequently, although I accept that the area has a strong residential character, this is created through a range of style and size of property that, in some instances, are developed close to one another. This gives the area a diverse and pleasant suburban character and one that the appeal proposal would follow. Overall, I am not persuaded that the development would harm the suburban character or established pattern of development in the locality.

    Thus, the development would not harm the character and appearance of the area. It would not be in conflict with Policy SCLP11.1 and SCLP5.7 of the East Suffolk Council Suffolk Coastal Local Plan 2020 (the SCLP) which seek, amongst other things, to ensure that developments clearly demonstrates an understanding of the key features of local character and seeks to enhance these features through innovative and creative means.

  5. Section 06

    [name]

    The coast, heaths and estuaries of Suffolk are internationally recognised wildlife assets. They include areas designated as Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas and [name]. Each habitat site has a zone of influence of 13km as identified by the East Suffolk Council Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy Supplementary Planning Document 2021 (the SPD).

    The Conservation of Habitat and Species Regulations 2017 require that the competent authority must ensure that there are no significant adverse effects from the proposed development, either alone or in combination with other projects, that would adversely affect the integrity of the designated sites. The effects arising from the proposal need to be considered in combination with other development in the area and adopting a precautionary approach.

    Since the proposal is for one additional dwelling, the number of recreational visitors would be limited and the likely effects on the designated sites from the development alone may not be significant. However, in combination with other developments it is likely that the proposal would have significant effects on the designated site. Given my findings, the Regulations place a duty on me as the competent authority to undertake an appropriate assessment of the implications of the appeal scheme in view of the site’s conservation objectives.

    The site is within the 13km zone of influence where new residential development is likely to result in recreational pressure, which would, both alone and in combination with other development within the zone of influence, have a likely significant effect on the interest features of the aforementioned site. Therefore, I consider that the development would have an adverse effect on the integrity of the site, but regard can be had to whether these adverse effects can be mitigated.

    The SPD sets out a strategic approach to mitigation by several Councils across the wider area, detailing those that would be funded by financial contributions at a specified tariff per dwelling. Since these include a range of habitat-based measures such as education, communication and monitoring, and have been endorsed by Natural England, I am satisfied that the measures would adequately overcome any adverse effects of the proposal on the designated sites.

    The appellant has provided evidence to demonstrate that they have made a per dwelling contribution to fund the [name] to the Council. Given the evidence before me I am satisfied that the mitigation measures have been secured and would be used for their intended purpose. The contributions would be necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms; directly related to the development; and fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the development, in accordance with Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010.

    As such, the contributions would count as mitigation toward maintaining the integrity of the sites. Thus, the development would not be in conflict with Policy SCLP10.1 of the SCLP or Section 15 of the Framework which seek to conserve and enhance the natural environment.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    The Council has suggested a number of conditions that I have considered in accordance with the Framework and the national Planning Practice Guidance. In the interest of precision and clarity, in some instances I have amended the

  7. Section 08

    conditions.

    Along with the standard time condition (1), the approved plans (2) should also be specified to provide certainty. In the interest of the visual amenity of the area, samples of the materials (3) to be used in the external construction of the dwellings hereby approved shall be agreed with the Council. Additionally, those trees that are identified to remain (4) post development shall not be damaged or destroyed and shall be protected during construction (5).

    In the interest of highway safety, the access (6) shall be laid out and retained in accordance with the approved plans. Visibility splays (7), parking and turning areas (8) shall also be provided along with a bin presentation point (9).

  8. Section 09

    Conclusion

    Thus, having regard to the development plan when read as a whole, the appeal is allowed.

  9. Section 10

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun within a period of three years beginning with the date of this permission.

    The development hereby permitted shall be completed in all respects strictly in accordance with drawings: 4024-01 (Site Location Plan) 4024-04D (Proposed Site Plan) 4024-05 (proposed Plans and [name] for Plot 2) 4024-06A ([address] Plans and Elevations) 4024-07A ([address] Elevations)

    No development shall commence until details of the roof and wall materials to be used for the new dwellings and associated garages, have been submitted to and approved by the local planning authority. The development shall be carried out and retained in accordance with the approved details.

    None of the trees or hedges shown to be retained on the approved plan shall be lopped, topped, pruned, uprooted, felled, wilfully damaged or in any other way destroyed or removed without the prior written consent of the local planning authority. Any trees or hedges removed, dying, being severely damaged or becoming seriously diseased within five years of the completion of the development shall be replaced during the first available planting season, with trees or hedges of a size and species, which shall previously have been agreed in writing by the local planning authority.

    No development shall commence or any materials, plant or machinery be brought on to the site until full details showing the position of fencing to protect all trees and hedgerows, shown to be retained on the approved plan, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The protective fencing shall comply with BS.5837 and be retained throughout the period of construction unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority.

    The access shall be completed in all respects in accordance with [name]. DM01 with an entrance width of 4.5m and be available for use before either of the hereby approved dwellings are occupied. Thereafter it shall be retained in its approved form. At this time all other means of access within the frontage of the application site shall be permanently and effectively "stopped up" in a manner which previously shall have been approved by the Local Planning Authority.

    Before the access is first used visibility splays shall be provided as shown on [name]. 4024-04D with an X dimension of 2.4m and a Y dimension of 43m and thereafter retained in the specified form. Notwithstanding the provisions of Part 2 Class A of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no obstruction over 0.6 metres high shall be erected, constructed, planted or permitted to grow within the areas of the visibility splays.

    The dwellings shall not be occupied until the area(s) within the site shown on [name]. 4024-04D for the purposes of manoeuvring and parking of vehicles has been provided and thereafter that area(s) shall be retained and used for no other purposes.

    Before the development is occupied details of the areas to be provided for storage and presentation of Refuse/Recycling bins shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The approved scheme shall be carried out in its entirety before the development is brought into use and shall be retained thereafter for no other purpose. End.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 361No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    16 September 2021Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    10 August 2021 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3264840
Application reference
DC/20/2805/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
East Suffolk
Planning authority code
E07000244

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Minor Dwellings
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
2
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
10 December 2020
Valid date
4 January 2021
Start date
11 May 2021
Planning authority decision date
2 October 2020
Appeal decision date
16 September 2021

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
3278
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
20 August 2026 at 16:25