Appeal 3271126
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
part single part two storey side and rear extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a part single part two storey side and rear extension at [site address] , Southgate, London [postcode] in accordance with the application, 20/5334/HSE, dated 9 November 2020, subject to the Schedule of conditions at the end of this decision.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property and the area.
Section 04
Reasons
The appeal property is a two-storey semi-detached dwelling located within a residential area. The front has a mock Tudor appearance whereas, the property, to the rear is simpler in appearance and benefits from a two-storey projection and an outbuilding. The appearance of dwellings, along the street, together with the generous spacing between them creates a pleasant suburban environment.
The proposed first floor extension would extend beyond the side wall of the host property and include a gable roof design. I find that the proposed development would be proportionate to the size of the host property and would not be overly dominant. The extension would reflect the simpler form of the rear of the property and represents a subservient addition through its size, set back and lower ridge line.
Whilst the proposed window would be wider than the window in the host property, I find that this would not unacceptably harm its appearance given the size of the host property and the proportions and scale of the proposal.
The proposed development would not unduly harm the character and appearance of the host property or the area. It accords with Policies CS1 and CS5 of the [name] (2012) and Policy DM01 of the Development Management Policies Development Plan Document (2012) which, amongst other things, seek the highest standards of urban design and developments to respect local context and character.
It would accord with guidance set out in the Council’s Residential Design Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2016) which, amongst other things, sets out that extensions should be consistent with the form, scale and architectural style of the original building.
Section 05
Conditions
I have considered the imposition of conditions in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework and Planning Practice Guidance. I have imposed a condition specifying the relevant drawings as this provides certainty. A condition requiring matching materials is necessary in the interests of safeguarding the character and appearance of the area.
Conditions for obscure glazing and restricting additional windows in the side elevation facing No.112 have been imposed in the interests of safeguarding the living conditions of neighbouring occupants.
Section 06
Conclusion
For the reasons set out above the appeal succeeds.
Section 07
Schedule of conditions
The development hereby permitted shall begin no later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: [name] 3076/1; [name] 3076/2; [name] 3076/3; [name] 3076/4; [name] 3076/5; [name] 3076/6; Site Plan and Block Plan.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
The upper floor window in the side elevation facing [address] shall be non-opening and fitted with obscure glazing prior to occupation and shall then be retained thereafter for the lifetime of the development.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification), no additional windows or doors shall be inserted in the side elevation of the development hereby permitted facing [address].
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 180No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 16 September 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 1 September 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3271126
- Application reference
- 20/5334/HSE
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Barnet
- Planning authority code
- E09000003
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 39 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 16 March 2021
- Valid date
- 16 March 2021
- Start date
- 25 May 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Appeal decision date
- 16 September 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 3306
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21