Appeal 3271366
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
redevelopment of backland site behind [address] Parade and [address] to provide five, two storey dwelling houses with pedestrian access point from Park Parade including associated landscaping, amenity space, refuse and cycle storage.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for redevelopment of backland site behind [address] Parade and [address] to provide five, two storey dwelling houses with pedestrian access point from Park Parade including associated landscaping, amenity space, refuse and cycle storage at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 205161FUL, dated 14 December 2020, subject to the attached Schedule of
Section 03
Main Issue
The Council did not make a decision on the planning application within the statutory period and this has taken the jurisdiction to determine the application away from the Council. The Council has provided an appeal statement which indicates that it would have granted planning permission.
This scheme follows an appeal dismissed in 2020 for a proposed development of six dwellings. Having regard to the comments of the previous Inspector and the evidence before me, I consider the main issue to be the effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety.
Section 04
Reasons
The primary difference between the scheme subject of the previous appeal and this proposal is the reduction of the number of dwellings from six to five. The sole pedestrian access to the site would be via a pedestrian link from Park Parade that would lead to a communal space at the north of the site. As such, while the footpath from Park Parade is narrow, it widens towards the approach to the site and the entrance to the site would have a considerable width to the building of Plot 1. In addition, a suitably worded condition could be attached to require improvements to the footpath and a resident controlled gate such that the route from the street to the proposed dwellings as a whole would not feel oppressive or unsafe.
I acknowledge local concerns including those regarding highway safety in particular that the scheme would remove the turning space for vehicles accessing the commercial units and the conflict between pedestrians and vehicles using the access. However, from the evidence, the existing turning area is not formal and its use as such could cease at any time. Furthermore, the proposal would result in a dedicated pedestrian access from Park Parade for the use of future occupiers of the development as well as for existing residents of the dwellings of Park Parade which would reduce the use of the access road by existing residents.
While the commercial units appear to be primarily serviced from the front of Park Parade, it is possible that some units could be serviced via the access road at the rear. While vehicles using the access road would be required to reverse onto [address], the pavement in this area significantly widens at the entry to the access allowing pedestrians space to avoid vehicles exiting the access. Furthermore, there is adequate visibility in both directions to allow pedestrians and motorists to see vehicles using the access and react accordingly. As such, while I accept that the vehicular access arrangement for the commercial units would be less than ideal, given that the existing arrangement could cease at any time, the scheme would not result in an unacceptable impact on highway safety.
A signed and dated [name] (UU) pursuant to Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 has been submitted as part of the appeal which prevents the development being occupied until the Council and future occupiers have been notified that future occupiers would not be permitted to obtain parking permits in the [name]. As such I am persuaded that the development would not result in on-street parking in the vicinity of the site.
The UU would also require an access management plan to be submitted to the Council and ensure that the residents of the dwellings of Nos 1 – [address] Parade would have use of the footpath. In addition, the UU requires a Service Waste Management Plan to be submitted to the Council and to maintain the landscaping area.
I have considered the UU in light of the statutory tests contained in Regulation 122 of The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 and I consider it is fairly and reasonably related to the development proposed and as such passes the statutory tests.
I note the comments of the previous Inspectors for scheme on the site. However, from the evidence those schemes have a greater number of dwellings than this scheme and further evidence regarding the circumstances of those cases are not before me to enable a direct comparison to be made with this appeal. In any event each case must be determined on its individual merits.
Consequently, the proposed development would not conflict with Policy D8 of The London Plan The Spatial Development Strategy For Greater London March 2021 which seeks a safe public realm among other things, the Development Management Development Plan Document [name] 2013, or the National Planning Policy Framework in this respect.
Section 05
Other Matters
I acknowledge the evidence regarding restrictive covenants and legal issues relating to the site. However, these are not planning matters and have not altered my overall decision.
I note an alternative proposal suggested by The Park Parade Action group. However, I have necessarily determined the proposal before me.
In addition, I acknowledge other local concerns including those relating to flooding. However, I see no reason why a condition relating to surface drainage would not adequately mitigate any harm in this respect.
Section 06
Conditions
I have considered the Council’s suggested conditions and made minor changes having regard to paragraph 56 of the Framework and the Planning Practice Guidance.
The conditions relating to time limits and specifying plans are necessary in the interests of certainty.
The condition relating to a construction and logistics management plan is necessary in the interests of highway safety and needs to be pre-commencement as it would affect the early stages of construction. The condition relating to surface drainage is also necessary in the interests of highway safety.
The condition relating to external materials is necessary to safeguard the character and appearance of the area but does not need to be pre-commencement as it would be unlikely to affect the early stages of construction. The condition relating to landscaping is also necessary to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.
Given the proximity to buildings with commercial use, the conditions relating to sound insulation is necessary to safeguard the living environment of future occupiers. These conditions do not need to be pre-commencement as they are unlikely to affect the early stages of construction.
The conditions relating to contamination and ventilation systems are necessary given the commercial uses of the adjacent areas. The pre-commencement condition relating to contamination is necessary is it would be likely to affect the early stages of construction. The condition relating to ventilation does not need to be pre-commencement as it would be unlikely to affect the early stages of construction.
The conditions relating to refuse and cycle parking are necessary in the interests of highway safety. The condition relating to amenity areas is necessary in the interests of the living environment of future occupiers.
The condition relating to the flue system of No [address] Parade is necessary in the interests of the living environment of future occupiers.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons given above the appeal should be allowed.
Section 08
SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 0267-01/01 [name] (site location plan); 0267-01/02 [name] (proposed floor plan & elevations plots 1& 2); 0267-01/03 [name] (proposed floor plan & elevations plots 3,4&5; 0267-01/04 [name] (proposed site layout); 8020-01 (landscape design plan)
No development shall commence on the site until a construction and logistics management plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Details shall include control measures for dust, noise, vibration, lighting, delivery locations, storage of materials on site; restriction of hours of work and all associated activities audible beyond the site boundary to 0800-1800hrs Mondays to Fridays and 0800 -1300 hrs on Saturdays, advance notification to immediate neighbours of proposed works and public display of contact details including accessible phone contact to persons responsible for the site works for the duration of the works. Approved details shall be implemented throughout the project period.
No development shall commence on the site until a detailed specification of the proposed improvements to the pedestrian path and the access lane that will service the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The development shall be implemented only in accordance with these approved details before first occupation of the dwellings hereby approved.
No development shall commence on the site until: a) A desktop study has been carried out which shall include the identification of previous site uses, potential contaminants that might reasonably be expected given those uses and other relevant information. Using this information a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for the site identifying all potential contaminant sources, pathways and receptors shall be produced and assessment of risk to identified receptors undertaken. The desk study will be submitted for approval in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to any development work (except demolition and site clearance) commencing. b) A site investigation has been designed for the site using the information obtained from the desktop study and any diagrammatical representations ([name]). This should be submitted to, and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to that investigation being carried out on the site. The investigation must be comprehensive enough to enable: - a risk assessment to be undertaken relating to future occupants of the site and to groundwater - and surface waters associated on and off the site that may be affected, and - refinement of the [name], and - the development of a [name] detailing the remediation requirements.
No development shall commence on the site until, a site investigation (undertaken in accordance with BS1075:2011+A1:2013 and LCRM and based on an approved conceptual site model contained within an approved desk study phase 1 report) has investigated the site and any previously inaccessible ground. The site conceptual model shall be amended based on the findings of the intrusive site investigation and the risks to identified receptors updated. This assessment must be undertaken by a competent person, and shall assess any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The findings of the site investigation and proposed remedial options shall be submitted to the Local planning authority for approval in writing prior to any remedial works commencing and any development works commencing.
A detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use shall be submitted to and subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria. The scheme must ensure that the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Part 2A of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 in relation to the intended use of the land after remediation. The approved remediation scheme must be carried out in accordance with its terms prior to the commencement of development, other than that required to carry out remediation works.
Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced; and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The verification report submitted shall be in accordance with the latest Environment Agency guidance and industry best practice.
No development above ground shall commence until all external surfaces (including hardstanding and boundary treatments) of the development hereby approved have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.
No development above ground shall commence until details of an enhanced sound insulation value DnT,w [and L’nT,w] of at least 5dB above the Building Regulations value, for the floor/ceiling/wall structures separating different types of rooms/ uses in adjoining dwellings, namely, staircase adjacent to bedroom of separate dwellings of the development hereby approved have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Approved details shall be implemented prior to occupation of the development and thereafter be permanently retained.
No development above ground shall commence until details of the sound insulation of the building envelope of the development hereby approved including glazing specifications (laboratory sound insulation including frames, seals and ventilators tested and approved in accordance with [name] 140- 3: 1995 & [name] 10140-2:2010) and of acoustically attenuated ventilation and cooling as necessary (with air intake from the cleanest aspect of the building) to achieve internal room- and (if provided) external amenity noise standards in accordance with the criteria of BS8233:2014 have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Approved details shall be implemented prior to occupation of the development and thereafter be permanently retained.
Details of hard/soft landscape works and boundary treatments for the development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before any part of the super structure is commenced. The development shall be implemented only in accordance with these approved details. Any trees or other plants which die or are removed within the first five years following the implementation of the landscaping scheme shall be replaced during the next planting season.
No development above ground shall commence until details have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, for the installation in the dwellings of a filtered fresh air ventilation system capable of mitigating elevated concentrations of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter in the external air. The details to be submitted shall include the arrangements for continuously maintaining the operational efficiency of the system. The ventilation system as approved shall be completed prior to occupation and shall be retained permanently thereafter.
No dwelling shall be occupied until noise reduction improvements to the restaurant kitchen extraction flue system to the rear of No [address] Parade have been implemented to achieve the following criteria: a) the external sound level emitted from the extract system shall be lower than the lowest existing background sound level by at least 5dBA as measured at/calculated to the nearest and/or most affected noise sensitive premises in order to prevent any adverse impact. The assessment shall be made in accordance with BS4142:2014, with all machinery operating together at maximum capacity. b) the externally located extraction/ ventilation system and ducting shall be mounted with proprietary anti-vibration isolators and fan motors shall be vibration isolated from the casing and adequately silenced and maintained as such; c) reductions in odour levels to meet Local Authority standards.
No dwelling shall be occupied until surface water drainage works shall have been implemented in accordance with details that shall first have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Before any details are submitted to the local planning authority an assessment shall be carried out of the potential for disposing of surface water by means of a sustainable drainage system, having regard to Defra's non-statutory technical standards for sustainable drainage systems (or any subsequent version), and the results of the assessment shall have been provided to the local planning authority.
No dwelling shall be occupied until all amenity areas shown on the approved plans have been laid out. The amenity areas shall be retained in perpetuity thereafter.
Refuse and recycling storage shall be provided in accordance with Council standards and shall be brought into use prior to the first occupation of the development permitted and retained permanently thereafter.
The cycle storage shown on the approved plans shall provide a minimum of 5 cycle parking spaces in accordance with policy and be brought into use prior to the first occupation of the development permitted and retained permanently thereafter.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 570No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 3 November 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 8 September 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3271366
- Application reference
- 205161FUL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Ealing
- Planning authority code
- E09000009
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Other minor developments
- Appeal type reason
- 8. Failed to give notice of its decision within the appropriate period (usually 8 weeks) on an application for permission or approval
- Appeal reason
- Failure
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 19 March 2021
- Valid date
- 19 March 2021
- Start date
- 1 July 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- Not recorded
- Appeal decision date
- 3 November 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 5503
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25