Appeal 3271371
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
3 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
Without planning permission, the erection of a single storey outbuilding within the curtilage of the property, adjacent to the principal property addressed at (2) above, shown edged in blue on the attached plan and deemed to be an annexe provision to the principal dwelling existing on the land.
Section 02
Conclusion
For the reasons given above, I conclude that the requirements of the notice are not excessive to remedy the breach of planning control. However, the period for compliance with the notice falls short of what is reasonable. I shall in this regard vary the enforcement notice prior to upholding it. The appeal on ground (f) though fails as outlined. 1 Ref: APP/C1625/D/20/3252920 Appeal Decisions APP/C1625/C/21/3271371, APP/C1625/C/21/3271372
Section 03
Formal Decision
It is directed that the enforcement notice is varied by: • the deletion of ‘6 months’ and the substitution of ‘9 months’ as the period for compliance in paragraph 6 of the notice.
It is directed that the enforcement notice corrected by: • the deletion of the wording ‘GL13 9JRF’ and substitution of ‘ [postcode] ’ in paragraph 2 of the notice; and • The substitution of the plan attached to this decision for that attached to the notice.
Subject to the variation and corrections, the enforcement notice is upheld.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 184No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 5 July 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 21 June 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3271371
- Application reference
- Not recorded
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Stroud District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000082
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- LPA's service of an Enforcement Notice
- Appeal reason
- Not recorded
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Lead
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Notice varied and upheld
- Decision category
- Dismissed
- Received date
- 19 March 2021
- Valid date
- 19 March 2021
- Start date
- 13 April 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- Not recorded
- Appeal decision date
- 5 July 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- 1
- Enforcement grounds
- f
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 227
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25