Appeal 3277475
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
erection of a rear single storey extension to detached dwelling, dimensions 5.50 metres beyond rear wall, 2.90 metres maximum height, 2.90 metres high to eaves.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and prior approval is not required under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the erection of a rear single storey extension to detached dwelling, dimensions 5.50 metres beyond rear wall, 2.90 metres maximum height, 2.90 metres high to eaves at land at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 21/01890/HHE, dated 9 April 2021, and the plans submitted with it.
Section 03
Procedural Matters
The description of development given above is taken from the Decision Notice and the appeal form, rather than the planning application form, as this provides a more concise description of the proposal.
The Council’s Development Management Report states that no objections were received from any of the adjoining occupiers. Accordingly, prior approval is not required in respect of the impact of the development on the amenity of adjoining premises.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is whether the proposal is permitted development under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (‘GPDO’) with regard to its external dimensions.
Section 05
Reasons
Class A of the GPDO enables the enlargement, improvement or other alteration of a dwellinghouse, provided certain criteria are met. In this case, the development would extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse, and beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse. Accordingly, the requirements of paragraphs A.1.(j) and A.1.(g) of the GPDO are both of relevance.
[name].1.(j) states that in order to constitute permitted development, side extensions must not exceed 4 metres in height, have more than a single storey, or have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse. In this case, each of these criteria would be met, including in relation to width (the extension would be 3.9 metres wide, compared to a dwelling width of 7.9 metres). The Class A requirements for side extensions would therefore be met.
[name].1.(g) states that in order to constitute permitted development, rear extensions must not extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by more than 8 metres (in the case of a detached dwellinghouse), or exceed 4 metres in height. Again, both of these criteria would be met. Moreover, there would be no cumulative exceedance of the limits set out in sub-paragraphs (e) to (j), as required by paragraph A.1.(ja).
For the above reasons, I conclude that the proposal is permitted development under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) with regard to its external dimensions.
Section 06
[name]
[name].3. of the GPDO requires that the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwelling. A further condition relating to external materials is therefore unnecessary.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 414No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 25 November 2021Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 9 November 2021 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3277475
- Application reference
- 21/01890/HHE
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Shropshire County Council
- Planning authority code
- E06000051
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 3. Refused prior approval of permitted development rights
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 17 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 21 June 2021
- Valid date
- 21 June 2021
- Start date
- 3 September 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- 24 May 2021
- Appeal decision date
- 25 November 2021
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 6588
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21