Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3277475

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

erection of a rear single storey extension to detached dwelling, dimensions 5.50 metres beyond rear wall, 2.90 metres maximum height, 2.90 metres high to eaves.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and prior approval is not required under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the erection of a rear single storey extension to detached dwelling, dimensions 5.50 metres beyond rear wall, 2.90 metres maximum height, 2.90 metres high to eaves at land at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 21/01890/HHE, dated 9 April 2021, and the plans submitted with it.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    The description of development given above is taken from the Decision Notice and the appeal form, rather than the planning application form, as this provides a more concise description of the proposal.

    The Council’s Development Management Report states that no objections were received from any of the adjoining occupiers. Accordingly, prior approval is not required in respect of the impact of the development on the amenity of adjoining premises.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is whether the proposal is permitted development under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (‘GPDO’) with regard to its external dimensions.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    Class A of the GPDO enables the enlargement, improvement or other alteration of a dwellinghouse, provided certain criteria are met. In this case, the development would extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse, and beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse. Accordingly, the requirements of paragraphs A.1.(j) and A.1.(g) of the GPDO are both of relevance.

    [name].1.(j) states that in order to constitute permitted development, side extensions must not exceed 4 metres in height, have more than a single storey, or have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse. In this case, each of these criteria would be met, including in relation to width (the extension would be 3.9 metres wide, compared to a dwelling width of 7.9 metres). The Class A requirements for side extensions would therefore be met.

    [name].1.(g) states that in order to constitute permitted development, rear extensions must not extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by more than 8 metres (in the case of a detached dwellinghouse), or exceed 4 metres in height. Again, both of these criteria would be met. Moreover, there would be no cumulative exceedance of the limits set out in sub-paragraphs (e) to (j), as required by paragraph A.1.(ja).

    For the above reasons, I conclude that the proposal is permitted development under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) with regard to its external dimensions.

  5. Section 06

    [name]

    [name].3. of the GPDO requires that the materials used in any exterior work shall be of a similar appearance to those used in the construction of the exterior of the existing dwelling. A further condition relating to external materials is therefore unnecessary.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 414No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    25 November 2021Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 November 2021 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3277475
Application reference
21/01890/HHE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Shropshire County Council
Planning authority code
E06000051

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
3. Refused prior approval of permitted development rights
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
17 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
21 June 2021
Valid date
21 June 2021
Start date
3 September 2021
Planning authority decision date
24 May 2021
Appeal decision date
25 November 2021

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
6588
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21