Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3279589

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

formation of loft conversion with dormer window and velux roof lights with associated internal alterations.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for formation of loft conversion with dormer window and velux roof lights with associated internal alterations at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 21/00789/HOUSE, dated 31 March 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Drawing no. 03 E.

    The tiles to be used in the construction of the dormer window hereby permitted shall match those on the roof of the existing dwelling.

  2. Section 03

    Application for costs

    An application for costs was made by [name] against West Berkshire Council. This application is the subject of a separate decision.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues are the effects of the proposed dormer window on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the local street scene.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal relates to a modern two-storey, detached house which lies at the end of a short private cul-de-sac serving three other properties off [address]. The dwelling is orientated gable-on to the [address] and it is set back behind dense roadside planting which creates an effective screen from the [address] throughout the year, even when the trees are not in leaf.

    The proposed dormer window would be constructed using plain tiles to match the existing roof and zinc cladding with vertical standing seams on the walls. It would be positioned almost centrally within the roof slope on the southern side elevation. The structure would be set away from the roof edges and eaves, and it would sit below the main ridge. This would ensure that the dormer reads as a subordinate and proportionate addition to the roof. It would not imbalance the front elevation of the property, as has been suggested by the Council.

    The Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance: ‘[name] (2004) states that dormer windows should not be used to increase floorspace within the dwelling. However, that is not the purpose of the appeal scheme which has been designed to achieve headroom above the staircase to comply with the Building Regulations. This would create a larger volume than traditional gabled dormers, examples of which are seen elsewhere in [address]. Nevertheless, the scale of the new dormer would not be unduly dominant and its appearance would be acceptable. The discreet position of the dwelling behind landscaping means that public visibility would be limited to a short stretch of [address] from where the development would be viewed at a distance. The street scene of the [address] would be unaffected.

    The Council has recently granted permission1 for a dormer window at 4 [address] Cottages which lies two doors away to the north. The approved design resulted from negotiation and has very strong similarities to the appeal scheme. That dormer will be considerably more prominent in comparison to the one being proposed at [site address] . The Council’s decision for No 4, which was made in the context of the same development plan policy and guidance, is a material consideration to which I have attached significant weight.

    I conclude that the proposed dormer would harmonise with the character and appearance of the host dwelling and it would not cause any material harm to the local street scene. There would be compliance with Policies CS14 and CS19 of the [name] 2006-2026 insofar as these seek high quality design that responds to local character.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    To provide certainty, I have attached a condition specifying the approved plan. I have also imposed a condition requiring the use of matching roof tiles, to secure harmonious architectural treatment.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 106No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    23 December 2021Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    6 December 2021 (page 1)
  • Costs Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 106No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    23 December 2021Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    6 December 2021 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3279589
Application reference
21/00789/HOUSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
West Berkshire District Council
Planning authority code
E06000037

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
31 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
23 July 2021
Valid date
3 August 2021
Start date
5 October 2021
Planning authority decision date
20 May 2021
Appeal decision date
23 December 2021

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Yes
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
8178
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21