Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3281546

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for a proposed first floor front extension, and addition of 2 roof lanterns and folding doors to rear involving demolition of existing conservatory.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a proposed first floor front extension, and addition of 2 roof lanterns and folding doors to rear involving demolition of existing conservatory at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, ref: P1003.21, dated 22 May 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: ESL483RM125NX – PL03 and PL04 3)The external finishes of the development hereby permitted shall match in material and colour those of the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    Since the determination of the application by the Council the Havering Local Plan November 2021 (LP) has been adopted. This has superseded all policies contained in the Council's Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document (2008). I have determined the appeal on the basis of the newly adopted LP.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the property and surrounding area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    [address] is a residential urban street. The appeal property is a two-storey, semi-detached dwelling within a long row of houses, many of which have been substantially altered with extensions of varying size and design. _________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________________

    Within the local area there are a number of properties with two-storey front additions of similar scale and appearance to that proposed. I acknowledge that these may pre-date the Council's current adopted guidelines, and that such development at first floor level is not as prevalent as single storey front extensions.

    Nonetheless, to my mind the various changes to the front elevations of many surroundings residences, including some modest two-storey elements, now form part of the established, varied character and appearance of the streetscene, and the proposal is consistent within this context. The scheme would not appear overly large or dominant, and would be well proportioned and detailed. I consider that it would integrate effectively with the host dwelling and conserve the visual impact of the locality.

    I note that the Council does not object to the alterations at the rear of the property and I have no reason to disagree.

    I am therefore of the view that the proposal would not result in harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling or the surrounding area. It would accord with Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021, the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document 2011 and policy D1 of the London Plan 2021, which seek to secure new development of acceptable scale and appearance.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of advice in Planning Policy Guidance and the National Planning Policy Framework. In addition to the standard implementation condition, the approved plans are listed for certainty. Additionally materials are required to match the existing building in order to ensure that the external appearance of the proposal is satisfactory.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    Having regard to all matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 212No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    12 January 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 December 2021 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3281546
Application reference
P1003.21
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Havering
Planning authority code
E09000016

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
23 August 2021
Valid date
23 August 2021
Start date
27 October 2021
Planning authority decision date
19 July 2021
Appeal decision date
12 January 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
8756
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21