Appeal 3284080
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
5 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the erection of detached garage in front garden.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of detached garage in front garden at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Reference 2021/0823, dated 28 June 2021, subject to the following
Section 03
conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing dwelling.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the street scene.
Section 05
Reasons
[address] is characterised by dwellings with modest front gardens other than in the vicinity of the appeal site where a group of four dwellings have a deeper set back and more spacious front gardens.
That said, the proposed garage would stand no further forward than the neighbouring bungalow to the east and marginally beyond the face of the projecting car port to the west. Within this context, I consider that the proposal, taking account of its size, scale and siting, would not appear unduly prominent or have an adverse effect on the street scene as a whole.
On this basis, I find no material conflict with development plan policies1 or the National Planning Policy Framework’s commitment to good design.
Having considered all other matters raised, I allow the appeal subject to the conditions specified by the Council.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1797No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 18 January 2022Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 10 January 2022 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3284080
- Application reference
- 2021/0823
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Gedling Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000173
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 31 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 1 October 2021
- Valid date
- 1 October 2021
- Start date
- 9 December 2021
- Planning authority decision date
- 7 September 2021
- Appeal decision date
- 18 January 2022
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 9045
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:25
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21