Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3284762

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the addition of dormer roof and one room in roof space.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the addition of dormer roof and one room in roof space at [address], Cullompton [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 21/00829/HOUSE, dated 26 April 2021, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following

  2. Section 03

    condition

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than [3] years from the date of this decision.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues are the effect on: • The character and appearance of the terrace of which the appeal property forms part and that of the local area; and • The living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers with reference to privacy.

  4. Section 05

    Character and Appearance

    The appeal property is a [address] artisan cottage that forms part of a short gable ended terrace of 4 cottages, which appear to be of some age, but that have undergone significant alteration, although not extension. The terrace is orientated so that the cottages turn their backs to the street and the front entrances to the cottages are in the elevation of the terrace that faces away from the street. The entrances to the cottages are approached from a passage walkway that separates the cottages from their associated rear garden spaces. The street access to this walkway is adjacent to the appeal property.

    The appeal property and the terrace of which it forms part is located in a residential area made up of a variety of semi-detached and detached houses and bungalows of variety of style and age. Many of these are set back from the street or are in closes or cul-de-sac locations that allow for a disjointed street scene, where street views area made up of a variety of the front side and rear elevations of these properties.

    The proposal is for a tile hung dormer extension that would stretch to the full width of the roof slope of the appeal property that is away from the street. The extension is designed to read as being in 3 distinct parts, each part with a window that would stretch to the full width of the roof slope of the appeal property that is away from the street. The design of the extension in 3 parts has the effect of breaking down its apparent scale, with the two end parts having a shallow pitch to their roof that would hip with the existing roof slope. This design approach would lead to the apparent scale of what is quite a large dormer extension complimenting the scale of the appeal property.

    The terrace of 4 cottages of which the appeal property forms part have been significantly altered. This is particularly apparent in the elevation of the terrace facing away from the street, where the differing wall colours, doors, window type and colours and mix of slate and asbestos tile roof materials do not result in a terrace of properties with a uniform character and appearance. [name] acknowledge that the proposal would represent the first apparent extension to the properties in the terrace, the addition of the proposed dormer extension to the appeal property would not, therefore result in harm to the character and appearance of the terrace as a whole.

    The main views of the proposal from the public realm would be from [address], where the flank cheek of the extension would be apparent, and from where it would sit proud of the existing roof slope in which it would sit and above the gable wall end of the appeal property.

    From my site visit it was evident that many of the bungalows and some houses in the area had been the subject of dormer extensions in a variety of roof slopes. Given the orientation of these properties to the street, as detailed above, these form a significant part of the general street scene of the local area. Within this context, the visibility of the proposal from the public and private realms would be in keeping with the local streetscene and would not result in harm to the character and appearance of the local area.

    For these reasons I find that the proposal would be in accordance with Policy DM1 and D11 of the Mid Devon Local Plan (2020) (The Local Plan), Policy TC02 of the Cullompton Neighbourhood Plan (2021) and Section 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) (the Framework), which collectively seek to ensure that development is of high quality design, a key aspect of sustainable development, and are sympathetic to local character.

  5. Section 06

    Living Conditions

    The proposal would add additional windows at roof level and would result in additional opportunities to look outwards from the appeal property at a higher vantage point than currently possible. Concerns have been raised with regard to the additional overlooking that this would afford of the gardens of the cottages on to which the appeal property faces.

    This additional overlooking would, however, be over and above the significant amount of overlooking that already exists from the ground and first floor of the appeal property and its neighbours in the terrace. I find, however, that this additional opportunity for overlooking would be to the degree that it would so substantially different from that already existing, that it would be experienced by those using the gardens as intrusive.

    Similarly, I find that given the separating distances, the oblique angles of view and the extent of existing overlooking, that the additional degree of overlooking of other nearby residential properties would be similar to that from houses in this local area, and would be no greater than that to be expected in a developed residential area of this type and would not result in a significant loss of privacy to their occupiers.

    The proposal would not, therefore, result in overlooking to a degree that would amount to a loss of privacy causing harm to the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers. For this reason, the proposal would accord with Policy DM11 of the Local Plan and Paragraph 130 of the Framework.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    In the interests of certainty, I have attached the standard time limit condition for implementation of the planning permission.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above and having regard to all matters raised the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 209No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    4 February 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    9 December 2021 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3284762
Application reference
21/00829/HOUSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Mid Devon District Council
Planning authority code
E07000042

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
17 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
13 October 2021
Valid date
13 October 2021
Start date
25 November 2021
Planning authority decision date
28 July 2021
Appeal decision date
4 February 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
10041
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21