Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3285340

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

extension & alterations.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for extension & alterations at [site address] , Spalding [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref H14-0730-21, dated 6 July 2021, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved drawings: 3857-21 01 [name] & Elevations - Existing. Site & [name]; 3857-21 02 [name] & Elevations - Proposed Site Plan.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    Three swift nest bricks shall be incorporated within the external walls of the extension hereby permitted, and retained thereafter.

    Before the access is brought into use, site boundary treatments facing onto the highway for a distance of 15 metres on each side of the access shall be lowered to a height not exceeding 0.6 metres above the edge of the adjacent carriageway, and thereafter maintained as such.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Dwellings on [address] are mainly twentieth century pitched roof, brick built detached and semi-detached two storey houses and bungalows, interspersed with some older houses.

    The appeal building is an older, Victorian semi-detached dwelling set at an oblique angle to the road on an approximately triangular corner plot. Its location towards the head of a curving stretch of village lane contributes to the foreground experience of a variety of building and roofline forms and angles, approaching the appeal site. This combination of factors contributes to the appeal property’s somewhat individualistic character.

    Within this context, the proposed extension would be set back from the road and the line of the host building’s front elevation. Its rear facade would align with the line of the existing rear kitchen elevation and neighbouring rear extension. Its ridge height would be slightly lower than the host house. Its roof pitch, and use of roof, wall and window materials to match the existing dwelling would further help it blend in visually. Also, the variety of building and roofline forms and angles approaching the appeal site would draw the eye elsewhere in various directions. This combination of factors would help the proposal to assimilate acceptably within its residential streetscene setting, without appearing visually discordant and alien.

    I therefore conclude that the proposal would respect the character and appearance of the area. As such, it would accord with Policies 2 and 3 of the South East Lincolnshire Local Plan 2011-2036, which together seek to ensure, among other things, that development respects local character.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    Local Highway Authority and resident concern was expressed regarding the safety and visibility of the proposed driveway access. However, in the light of the visibility splay and vehicle manoeuvring information added to the amended Proposed Site Plan drawing [name], the LHA assessed the proposal as being acceptable, subject to a suggested planning condition regarding boundary treatment height to maintain the visibility splay, which I have attached. In the light of this clarifying information, I agree that the proposal would be acceptable in terms of highway safety.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard commencement condition, a condition is necessary requiring that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans, in order to provide certainty. A condition covering materials is necessary in the interests of safeguarding the character and appearance of the area. A condition about swift nest bricks is attached in the interests of biodiversity. A condition regarding boundary height is necessary to safeguard highway safety.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    The proposed development would adhere to the development plan and there are no other considerations which outweigh this finding. Accordingly, for the reasons given, the appeal succeeds. [planning inspector] INSPECTOR

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 87No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    25 February 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    22 February 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3285340
Application reference
H14-0730-21
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
South Holland District Council
Planning authority code
E07000140

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
21 October 2021
Valid date
21 October 2021
Start date
1 December 2021
Planning authority decision date
15 October 2021
Appeal decision date
25 February 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
11283
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21