Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3285572

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

first floor extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for first floor extension at [site address] , Kenilworth [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/21/0872, dated 4 May 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: BLR / 02 [name] and Site Location Plan Ref: #00628689-D296B5.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure

    The site visit was undertaken by an Appeal Planning Officer whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The effect of the proposed extension upon the character and appearance of the street scene.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    No [site address] is a two-storey semi-detached property where the ground floor projects forward of the first floor across the full width of the dwelling and the attached dwelling. The surrounding dwellings comprise pairs of dwellings in several different styles, with consistent scale and proportions but some variation in the design and the materials used. This consistency positively contributes to the character and appearance of the street scene.

    The proposed extension would only extend approximately half the width of the dwelling with the ridge set well below that of the main roof. It would not be built forward of the ground floor and would use matching materials. As a result, the proposal would appear proportionate and subservient to the existing dwelling and its scale would not unbalance the appearance of the pair. It would also respect the characteristic features of the dwelling by retaining the decorative window designs and a significant amount of the ground floor forward projection adjoining that of the attached dwelling.

    The various house designs on the wider estate incorporate different window types and rendered panels or brickwork at first floor, therefore they are not uniform at this level. No 21 has a similar first floor extension to that proposed, as do several other dwellings within the wider estate on similar house types. As a result, and due to its sympathetic design, the proposed extension would not appear alien or incongruous within the street scene. Consequently, the scale and appearance of the proposed extension would not harmfully disrupt the consistent appearance of the dwellings or the street scene.

    Therefore, the proposed extension would not harm the character or appearance of the street scene and would comply with Policy BE1 of the Warwick District Local Plan 2011-2029 (adopted 2017) and Policy KP13 of the Kenilworth Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2029 (made 2018). These policies expect development to respect and have a positive response to the surrounding buildings and the site characteristics in terms of scale, height, form and massing.

    I also find no conflict with the Residential Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (2018) which, while it does not provide advice regarding front extensions, recommends extensions are generally subservient to the existing dwelling and respect the character of a matching pair. Moreover, the proposal would accord with the general design policies within the National Planning Policy Framework.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    Further to the statutory commencement condition it would be necessary in the interests of certainty for the extension to be carried out in accordance with the approved plans. In the interest of the character and appearance of the area it would be necessary for the materials used in the external surfaces to match the host dwelling.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    The proposed extension would comply with the development plan as a whole and for the reasons given above and having had regard to all other matters raised, I recommend that the appeal should be allowed.

  7. Section 08

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and the Appeal Planning Officer’s report and, on that basis, I agree with the recommendations and shall allow the appeal.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 133No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    24 January 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    11 January 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3285572
Application reference
w/21/0872
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Warwick District Council
Planning authority code
E07000222

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
3 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
26 October 2021
Valid date
26 October 2021
Start date
6 December 2021
Planning authority decision date
7 October 2021
Appeal decision date
24 January 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
9297
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21