Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 3288528

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

4 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

erection of 2 storey rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    I consider that the main issue is the effect of the extension on the character and appearance of the existing building and the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a former stone barn that has been converted to a dwelling. It is located close to [site address] amongst a grouping of stone buildings. [site address] has only a small area of amenity space to the rear with its main outdoor amenity area to the front of the dwelling. The proposed extension would be singe storey and shaped to fit the irregular boundary at the rear of the property.

    Local Plan Policy CDMP31 seeks to ensure that all development is of a high standard of design that responds positively to the character and form of its surroundings. The National Planning Policy Framework2 also supports good design. Supplementary Planning Document, [name] Home3 sets out further design principles including ensuring that an extension reflects and complements the main design features and architecture of the original property and complements the general character of the surrounding area. Local Plan Policy SP4 notes that the open and rural character of the countryside is intrinsic to the identity and ‘sense of place’ in Wyre and the policy seeks to protect the countryside. 1 Wyre Council – Wyre Local Plan (2011 – 2031) February 2019. 2 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government National Planning Policy Framework, 2021 (the Framework). 3 Extending Your Home Supplementary Planning Document Local Development Framework, [name] 2007 – Blackpool Council, Fylde Borough Council and Wyre Borough Council.

    The position of [site address] and its proximity to the road make it very visible from the road. Works to convert the barn have ensured that its traditional form and character have been retained and [site address] and the group of building in this immediate area generally reflect their setting in the countryside. However, the proposed extension would detract from the existing building and unlike the original conversion, it would add a feature that would appear out of character with its original form.

    Despite being built in materials to match the existing house and having a sloping roof, the extension would appear as an addition to the traditional form of the former barn. Its overall size, and irregular shape would appear incongruous and given its prominence, it would also detract from the character of the group of buildings in this rural setting. Due to the sensitivity required for further alterations to buildings such as this one, I consider that the proposal would not meet the expected design standards indicated in the above policies and guidance.

    I have considered all matters raised but none alter my conclusion. I conclude that the proposal would have a harmful effect on the character of the existing building and the area. It would conflict with Local Plan Policies CDMP3 and SP4, the SPD and the Framework. Therefore, the appeal fails.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 226No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    16 February 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    1 February 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3288528
Application reference
21/00625/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Wyre Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000128

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
7 December 2021
Valid date
7 December 2021
Start date
11 January 2022
Planning authority decision date
27 October 2021
Appeal decision date
16 February 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
10731
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:25
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21