Appeal 3288867
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
proposed front double storey extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is dismissed.
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
[name] of Case from the appellant has been submitted with the appeal and I have proceeded on the basis of the information before me.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the street scene.
Section 05
Reasons
The local area is residential in character. [address] consists of detached and semi-detached houses flacking each side of the road. These houses are located in a planned housing estate of a consistent style and design, with curved double height windows to the front elevation and hipped roofs a recognised feature.
The appeal dwelling occupies a wide plot and is prominent within the street scene as it is located on the corner with [address] and [address]. A porch has been added to the dwelling and is of a modest scale and typical design. This would be removed to accommodate the proposal that would be centrally positioned and two-storey in height with a hipped roof.
A projecting extension to the front elevation as demonstrated, and its proposed scale would appear uncharacteristic in this location where houses are of a uniform architectural composition that demonstrates strong harmony. As there was no evidence of other similarly designed extensions within the street scene, this would further emphasize its incongruous appearance. The proposal would not represent good design and would therefore cause adverse harm to the character and appearance of the local area.
Therefore, to conclude on this main issue, due to the design and location of the proposal, it would not appear as a subordinate extension and would not respect the articulation of the host dwelling or integrate with the street scene. Thus, it would be contrary to Policy P10 of the [name], Policies GP5 and BD6 of the Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG1 of the Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document and National Planning Policy Framework in their combined design aims.
Section 06
Conclusion
The proposal would lead to conflict with the development plan taken as a whole. There are no material considerations that indicate the decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan. For the reasons given above the appeal is dismissed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 296No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 9 March 2022Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 21 February 2022 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3288867
- Application reference
- 21/06283/FU
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Leeds City Council
- Planning authority code
- E08000035
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 6 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Dismissed
- Decision category
- Dismissed
- Received date
- 10 December 2021
- Valid date
- 14 January 2022
- Start date
- 20 January 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 22 October 2021
- Appeal decision date
- 9 March 2022
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 11998
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:26
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21