Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3289131

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the conversion of an existing garage into a habitable room.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the conversion of an existing garage into a habitable room at [site address] , Thamesmead, Greenwich [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 21/2937/HD, dated 16 August 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: PA1, PA2 and PA3.

    The external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in the materials that match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in the appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host terrace and the surrounding area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is occupied by a three-storey terrace dwelling with a single storey attached garage projecting from the front elevation. The dwellings within the host terrace and surrounding area are similar in scale and appearance, with a characteristic three-storey, flat roof style and a single storey projection to the front, giving the properties a relatively uniform appearance.

    In the immediate area around the appeal site, including the host terrace, the garage doors have been retained on the properties. However, whilst commonplace, the garage doors themselves do not form a particularly distinctive feature and make a neutral contribution to the streetscene.

    The proposed loss of the garage door, and its replacement with a window, would alter the appearance of the host dwelling. However, this alteration would be minimal and would not significantly change the properties visual contribution to the overall terrace. The scale and form of the building would remain as existing and the proposal would not impact upon the characteristic building style or general uniformity. As such, the loss of the garage door would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the terrace or the surrounding area.

    Whilst the presence of a window, to replace the garage door, would deviate from the prevailing pattern of development, the size and design of the proposed window would be in keeping with the host dwelling and surrounding properties. It would therefore not appear as an incongruous addition within the streetscene.

    Consequently, the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the host terrace or the surrounding area and would comply with Policies DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: [name] with [name] (2014) and Policy D3 of The London Plan (2021). These policies collectively seek to ensure that all development is a high quality of design and of a scale appropriate to the building and locality, with development proposals responding to the existing character of a place.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time period for commencement of the development, I have attached a condition requiring the development to accord with the approved plans, as this provides certainty and precision. A condition requiring the use of materials matching that of the existing building is also necessary to ensure an appropriate appearance for the development.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons set out above, having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other material considerations, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 3373No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    10 May 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    19 April 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3289131
Application reference
21/2937/HD
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Planning authority code
E09000011

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
15 December 2021
Valid date
15 December 2021
Start date
10 January 2022
Planning authority decision date
11 October 2021
Appeal decision date
10 May 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
14960
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21