Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3290338

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

an outbuilding.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for an outbuilding at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 21/07215/FUL, dated 21 July 2021 and in accordance with the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision;

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building;

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: 21/0210/01 [name];

    Two bird boxes should be incorporated into the development hereby permitted and be retained for the lifetime of the development.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matter

    The description of the proposed development is taken from the application form. In its decision notice, the Council refers to the proposal as a “detached carport/store.”

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a two storey detached dwelling located on a large garden plot in the countryside. It is close to a cluster of dwellings and buildings to the east and agricultural fields to the north and west.

    The dwelling is set well-back from the road behind a large parking area, which itself is located behind a wide grass verge. The appeal site is largely surrounded by tall trees, hedgerows and planting. During my site visit, I noted that the presence of evergreen and deciduous trees and tall hedgerows combine with the setting back of the appeal property to largely obscure the front corner of the property, where a large container is located, from view. The proposed outbuilding would be located in this corner.

    Also during my site visit, I noted the presence of outbuildings associated with dwellings – in many different forms – to be characteristic of this rural area. Consequently, outbuildings do not draw attention to themselves as unusual or uncommon features. Further, within the vicinity of the appeal site, I also noted the presence of very large buildings – associated both with farming and with commercial operations – as well as with major infrastructure works. Such features are not of a domestic scale, but the presence of hedgerows, trees and the undulating nature of the land mean that even such large buildings do not appear unduly dominant within their surroundings.

    The proposed timber outbuilding would be modest in dimensions and taking the above into account, would be partly obscured from view, especially outside of the winter months. The careful selection of materials ensures that the proposal would appear ancillary to [site address] and I find that it would make effective use of a small part of a much larger area of hardstanding to the front of that dwelling.

    Further to the above, glimpses of the proposal would be seen in the context of other nearby buildings and within an area characterised by the presence of a wide range of outbuildings.

    Taking the above into account, I find that the proposed development would be sympathetic to local character and would respect its surroundings. Consequently, it would not harm the character and appearance of the area and would not be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework, to Wycombe District Local Plan (2019) Policy DM35, or to the Council’s Householder Planning and Design Supplementary Planning Document (2019), which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    24 June 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    27 May 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3290338
Application reference
21/07215/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Wycombe Area *
Planning authority code
E07000007

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
33 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
8 January 2022
Valid date
8 January 2022
Start date
1 February 2022
Planning authority decision date
22 November 2021
Appeal decision date
24 June 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
16855
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21