Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3291402

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of tiled/pitched roof to replace existing porch flat roof.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of tiled/pitched roof to replace existing porch flat roof at [site address] , Gossops Green, Crawley [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2021/0777/FUL, dated 22 October 2021, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the dwelling and wider area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a detached two storey dwelling located within a residential area. There is a variety in housing types and styles although the palette of materials used provides a degree of homogeny. Properties are generally set in from their front boundaries and have open frontages. This together with the grassed verges, planting in front gardens and street trees gives the area an open, verdant and spacious character.

    The proposed roof would have a pitched design, creating a small front gable above the front door, that would be finished with hanging tiles. Gables and hanging tiles are a feature of many properties in the vicinity, including the appeal property. The footprint of the porch would not be altered, and the pitch of the new roof would be below first-floor windowsill level. Overall, its size, design and materials would ensure that the proposed roof would integrate with the existing dwelling and be a subservient feature of the property.

    Whilst a number of properties in the vicinity have flat roof porches, there are other properties which have had front extensions and alterations that have incorporated mono-pitch roofs. This reinforces the variety of built form along [address]. Furthermore, the appeal property, like some but not all dwellings on [address] is detached and incorporates a rounded bay window and is thus a further demonstration that there is not complete uniformity in the street. Importantly, the appeal property is set noticeably further back from the public footpath than its immediate neighbours in [address]. Accordingly, these variations would enable a pitched roof porch to be introduced to this property without it disrupting the overall character of the street scene.

    All of the above would ensure that the proposed roof would accord with the appearance of the existing dwelling; would respect the spacious character of the area and not be overly prominent within the street scene or compete visually with the designs or appearances of the neighbouring properties. Therefore, I find that the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of either the dwelling or the wider area.

    Accordingly, the proposal would accord with Policies CH2 and CH3 of the Crawley Borough Local Plan 2015 – 2030 and the Council’s ‘Urban Design’ Supplementary Planning Document, 2016 which, amongst other things, seek to ensure that development in general is well designed and that works to the front of houses in particular are subservient and in keeping with the character of the area and property.

    The proposal would also accord with the National Planning Policy Framework which aims to achieve well-designed places.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    The proposed porch roof would not result in an increase in water usage and accordingly would be water neutral. As such, it would not affect water abstraction in the [name] upon the Arun Valley’s protected Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area and Ramsar sites and thus not conflict with the obligations under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, a condition is required in the interests of certainty that lists the approved plans. A condition is also necessary to ensure the external materials match the existing building and thus protect the character and appearance of both the dwelling and the wider area.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, having considered the development plan as a whole, along with all other relevant material considerations, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed subject to the conditions below.

  7. Section 08

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Site/Block Plan & Location Plan – WPD9721/A/01 [name] & Roof Plan – WPD9721/A/12 [name] – WPD9721/A/13 [name]

    The external materials used in the development hereby permitted shall match those of the existing building. END

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 272No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    27 April 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    20 April 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3291402
Application reference
CR/2021/0777/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Crawley Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000226

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
7 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
25 January 2022
Valid date
25 January 2022
Start date
2 February 2022
Planning authority decision date
5 January 2022
Appeal decision date
27 April 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
14379
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21