Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3292441

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for a 2 storey side extension with link to existing annex.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for a 2 storey side extension with link to existing annex at [site address] , [address], Whiston [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2021/0729, dated 9 November 2021, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans: a. Plans as proposed – drawing no: AL(0)100, [name], Oct 2020 b. Elevations as proposed – drawing no: AL(0)101, [name], Oct 2020

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a detached stone dwelling set back from the highway by a long private driveway and sat within generously sized grounds. The site is located within open countryside and the surrounding area is rural agricultural land.

    The extension would be set down from the ridge and in from the front of the host dwelling. It would also be inset from the rear. The overall width would be proportionate. In these regards, the appeal scheme would comply with the Council’s adopted [name] (2018).

    These features would provide a clear distinction and visual break between the host dwelling and the proposed extension, resulting in the development being seen as subordinate. The use of matching construction materials, including fenestration, would contribute to the development being seen as a natural extension to the host dwelling rather than an incongruous new feature within the street scene.

    The proposed link extension between the annex and the main building would appear discrete due to the close proximity of the two buildings and their orientation. Views would also be screened by the agricultural outbuildings located adjacent to the main dwelling. The additional floorspace created by the link would be minimal. Taken together with the external materials to match the host dwelling, the proposal would relate well to the host dwelling.

    The proposed alterations to the annex building, which would include roof improvements, would be modest. As the annex building is already present, it would not create additional floorspace or bulk to the main dwelling and would remain subordinate. In addition, views of the annex building are partially screened by a row of mature evergreen trees and the adjacent agricultural outbuildings.

    For the reasons given above, the proposed development would not harm the character or appearance of the host dwelling or the surrounding area. As such, it would comply with Policies SS10 and DC1 of the Staffordshire Moorlands Local Plan (2020), which seek to ensure extensions are appropriate in scale and design and are not detrimental to the character of the area. The proposal also accords with the [name] (SPD) (2018), and the [name] for Development in the [name] (SPG), which seek to ensure extensions are subordinate to the main building.

    In addition, the proposal would adhere with the National Planning Policy Framework (para 130), which emphasises the importance of securing good design and states that development should respond to local character and add to the overall qualities of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have imposed the standard time condition for certainty and the approved plans for enforcement purposes. In order to ensure a suitable quality external appearance, I have required that the external materials to be used match the dwelling.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    The appeal scheme complies with the development plan for the reasons I have set out. The appeal should therefore be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 2074No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    21 March 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    8 March 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3292441
Application reference
SMD/2021/0729
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
Planning authority code
E07000198

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
9 February 2022
Valid date
9 February 2022
Start date
24 February 2022
Planning authority decision date
7 January 2022
Appeal decision date
21 March 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
12661
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21