Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3294281

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

erection of a single storey rear extension and single storey side garage.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for erection of a single storey rear extension and single storey side garage in accordance with the terms of application ref: APP/21/01986, dated 11 October 2021 and subject to the conditions in the schedule at the end of this decision.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    No. [site address] is located at the junction of [address] and [address]. It is a two-storey semi-detached dwelling, set back from both adjacent roads. The character of the area is of dwellings alongside tree lined boulevards with grass verges adding to the overall verdant appearance. Many of the dwellings have retained their front gardens, whereas the appeal building has a bland empty space which may be used for vehicle parking and manoeuvring.

    The proposed extension would infill an area at the rear of the building, enabling the installation of a row of patio doors in the new structure. A single storey rear extension would be demolished as part of the proposal. The adjoining semi-detached dwelling has a rear extension, separated from the rear garden of No.16 by a hedge and no issues have been raised by the Council in terms of any loss of amenity for neighbours. Subject to a condition regarding the use of external materials to match those of the dwelling, I consider that this part of the development would be acceptable.

    The proposed garage would occupy land next to the side of the house which has previously been used for parking a vehicle. The garage would be in a prominent position at this corner plot and would not meet the advice in the Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance 11: [name] as it would occupy more than half the width of the plot between the property and the adjacent highway. Nevertheless, the areas of grass verge on [address] would retain sufficient sense of openness around the proposed garage. However, to help mitigate the visual impact of the garage and to complement the character of the area I consider that it would be appropriate to impose a condition requiring landscape treatment including shrub planting within the former front garden of the building, whilst retaining a space for parking and manoeuvring a vehicle.

    I consider that the proposed extension and garage would be of an appropriate scale in relation to the plot and would not dominate the existing building or be visually overbearing when viewed from adjoining houses. Subject to conditions, the proposal would have no significant harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area. It would therefore fail to conflict with Wirral Unitary Development Plan policy HS11.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard condition for commencement of development I have included a condition to specify the approved plans. A condition is imposed requiring the use of external materials to match those of the main dwelling in the interest of maintaining the character and appearance of the area. As mentioned above, conditions are included to ensure the front garden of the site is landscaped in the interest of visual amenity and biodiversity.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    I have taken all other matters raised into account, including paragraphs 130 and 134 of the National Planning Policy Framework concerning the design quality of proposed developments. However, for the reasons given above, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

  6. Section 07

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this permission.

    The materials to be used in the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: • A101 - 1:500 Site Location Plan TQRQM21284091409850, dated 11th October 2021. • A105 - [name], Revision 1, dated 11/10/2021. • A106 - [name], Revision 1, dated 11/10/2021. • A107 – [name] and [name], Revision 1, dated 11/10/2021. • A108 – Proposed 3D, Revision 1, dated 11/10/2021.

    No development shall commence until there shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority a scheme of landscaping, including shrub planting within the front garden area of the site.

    All planting, comprised in the approved details of landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the completion of the development and any trees, shrubs or plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 108No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    17 June 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    18 May 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3294281
Application reference
APP/21/01986
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
Planning authority code
E08000015

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
28 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
4 March 2022
Valid date
4 March 2022
Start date
18 March 2022
Planning authority decision date
31 January 2022
Appeal decision date
17 June 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
16579
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21