Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 3295527

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a first floor rear extension with new front window and side window with Juliet balcony.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matters

    The Council’s decision notice describes the proposed development as “infill extensions to front and rear, roof alterations to accommodate first floor living space including raising the ridge height, front gables and rear dormer windows.”

    Permission was recently granted for a first floor rear extension1 with new front window and side windows with Juliet balcony. The proposal the subject of this appeal would project to the rear across the full width of the dwelling, whereas the recent permission provides for a step-in from the side of the property closest to the neighbouring property, Number [address].

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this case is the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of Number [address], with regards to daylight and sunlight.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a two storey detached dwelling located in a mixed use but largely residential area along [address], a busy highway to the north west of Aylesbury. The dwelling is set back from the road behind an open parking area. It is of brick construction and has a number of extensions to the rear. 1 Reference: 21/00854/APP.

    Beyond the dwelling to the rear is a garden, to the back of which is a large detached outbuilding.

    During my site visit, I observed that the side of the appeal dwelling is located close to the side of No [address], a two storey end-terrace dwelling.

    Further to observation during my site visit, I noted that the levels of daylight and sunlight reaching the side of No 63 are already relatively low, due to the orientation of that dwelling’s windows and to the existing scale and proximity of the appeal dwelling; and that any further reductions in respect of daylight and sunlight would be likely to result in a significant impact in respect of loss of light and overshadowing.

    The proposed development would bring a first storey extension close to the shared boundary between Nos 61 and 63 and given the proximity, location and scale of the development proposed, it would inevitably result in some degree of reduction in the amount of sunlight and daylight reaching the side of Number 63. 10.Consequently, taking all of the above into account, I find that the proposed development would harm the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regards to daylight and sunlight, contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework; to Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan (2021) Policy BE3; and to the Council’s Residential Extensions Design Guide (Amended 2013), which together amongst other things, seek to protect residential amenity.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    24 June 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    27 May 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3295527
Application reference
21/04330/APP
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
Planning authority code
E07000004

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
42 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
24 March 2022
Valid date
24 March 2022
Start date
7 April 2022
Planning authority decision date
30 December 2021
Appeal decision date
24 June 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
16876
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21