Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 3298364

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a proposed new garage to front.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [site address] is a 2 storey semi-detached property in a predominantly residential area. It occupies a prominent corner plot at the end of a row of properties of similar appearance. The dwellings are set back from [address], with an intervening service road between it and the front boundaries of the properties. The existing dwellings, whilst staggered in their presentation to the street, have largely open frontages, some with vegetation, enclosed by low boundary walls, which contributes positively to a pleasant sense of openness and uniformity to the street scene. Garages, where present, are positioned to the side of and either integral to or attached to the properties, and do not project forward of the front elevations of the dwellings.

    The proposed detached pitched roof garage would be positioned to the side of the dwelling, forward of the front elevation and closer to the highway than the dwelling. The garage would also be sited forward of the neighbouring property at [address]. Notwithstanding its set back from [address], the garage would be clearly visible from both the main and the service roads. As a result of the siting and design of the garage it would be a discordant and conspicuous feature that would be visually intrusive in the street scape, at odds with the prevailing character of the area.

    For the above reasons, the appeal scheme would harm the character and appearance of the area. It would therefore conflict with saved Policy E20 of the Northampton Local Plan 1993 -2006 [name] 1997 which promotes high quality design which reflects the character of its surroundings, and Policy S10 of the [name] Local Plan (Part 1) [name] 2014 which, among other things, requires development to protect, conserve and enhance the built environment. The proposal would also fail to accord with advice in the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Design Guide Supplementary Planning [name] 2011 with regards to the siting of garages and the National Planning Policy Framework in relation to development being sympathetic to local character.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    Whilst the proposed garage would be subservient in scale to the host dwelling and constructed using materials that would match those used in the existing building, this would not overcome the harm identified above. In addition, the fact that there would be no adverse effect on highway safety or residential amenity is a neutral factor.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above the appeal should be dismissed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 3016No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    17 August 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    26 July 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3298364
Application reference
WNN/2021/1109
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Northampton Borough Council *
Planning authority code
E07000154

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
6 May 2022
Valid date
20 May 2022
Start date
31 May 2022
Planning authority decision date
25 March 2022
Appeal decision date
17 August 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
19414
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21