Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3299902

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the replacement of the garage with a side extension including rear dormer and rooflights, changes to all windows, doors and porch.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the replacement of the garage with a side extension including rear dormer and rooflights, changes to all windows, doors and porch at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref.22/00656/HOU, dated 27 February 2022, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the following approved plans and documents: PL1-P100 [name] – Proposed (roof plan added) PL1-P100 [name] – Proposed, with mark up PL1-P200 [name] – Proposed, with mark up PL1-P201 [name]#2 - Proposed PL1-P202 [name]#3 – [name]-E001 Location Plan PL-E002 Block Plan - [name]-E002 Block Plan – Existing showing Shaded Proposed Development P-P099 [name] - Proposed PL1-E200 Elevations – Existing PL1-E201 Elevations#2 - Existing PL1-E202 Elevations#3 - Existing PL1-P100 [name] – Existing Tree Survey Impact Assessment Basement Impact Assessment

  2. Section 03

    Design & [name]

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing dwelling.

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues in the appeal are the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and streetscene, the setting of the [address] Conservation Area and the effect on the [address]/[address] Strategic Area of Special Character.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a two storey dwelling situated on [address], which is a cul-de-sac made up of similar dwellings. The topography of [address] rises quite steeply from its junction with [address]. No. 8 is a corner property which is located at right angles to no.7 and is only glimpsed from [address]. No.8 has a single storey attached garage and some off road parking. Its rear garden is on a lower level to the main house and it backs onto Richmond Park and the rear of dwellings in [address]. It is directly adjacent to the [address] Conservation Area. It is within the [address]/[address] Strategic Area of Special Character which is a non-designated asset.

    The proposal is to demolish the existing garage and construct a basement level element with 3 storeys on top of it, one of which would be a roof dormer storey.

    Whilst the bulk of the proposal is large at four storeys, the scheme makes effective use of the available land and topography. The basement storey would utilize part of the lower garden without detrimentally impacting on the amenities of neighbours and leaving sufficient private amenity space for the occupants of the appeal site.

    The side extension would not extend wider than the existing garage and its additional bulk and massing would be visually balanced with the existing northern element of the dwelling. Whilst the proposed roof would have a hip which would not be matched at the northern end of the building, the hip would be shallow, would be visually concealed from most public vantage points and would reduce the impact of built development from [address]. The rear dormer would be well-designed, having a pitched roof and being aligned with fenestration on the 3 levels below it.

    The insertion of roof lights and changes in fenestration would not cause loss of amenities to neighbours and would be in keeping with the character of the property.

    The proposed increased bulk and massing would be designed so as to sustain rather than overwhelm the original character of the property. The resulting development would be in a modestly larger footprint than the existing dwelling. Owing to the topography of the site, the orientation of the host dwelling and its semi-concealed position in [address], it would not be visually unacceptable either to the host dwelling itself or to the character or appearance of the streetscene. There would be no measurable impact on the setting of the [address] Conservation Area or on the [address]/[address] Strategic Area of Special Character.

    Overall, I conclude that the proposal would not result in harm to the character or appearance of the host dwelling, the streetscene, the setting of the [address] Conservation Area or the [address]/[address] Strategic Area of Special Character. The proposal would accord with policies CS8 and DM10 of the Council's adopted [name] (adopted 2012).

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 98No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    22 July 2022Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    7 July 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3299902
Application reference
22/00656/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Planning authority code
E09000021

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
27 May 2022
Valid date
27 May 2022
Start date
9 June 2022
Planning authority decision date
27 April 2022
Appeal decision date
22 July 2022

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
18237
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21