Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3303370

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for single storey side extension to include overed seating area at the back in accordance with application ref: P/0920/22 dated 3 March 2022 in accordance with the conditions as set out in the Schedule below.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issue is the impact of the proposal upon character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal property is a modern semi detached dormer style bungalow located along a short cul de sac that runs to the rear of the A312 [address]. [address] ends in a small car park belonging to a Local Authority operated building. Due to the modest size of the cul de sac along with its location to the rear of [address], the appeal property is not readily visible from much of the surrounding area.

    The site of the proposed extension would be to the side of the appeal property and would contain two modest rooms at the front and rear of the extension separated by a shower room and wc. The extension would have bi-folding doors opening into the good sized rear garden of the property as well as a separate door giving access to the front of the property. The extension would have a flat roof and be constructed of matching brickwork to that of the principal dwelling.

    The proposed use of the extension would be for the Appellant’s elderly father who would occupy the extension. In order to maintain his independence the Appellant wishes to maintain separate access into the extension and unusually Appeal Decision Appeal Ref: APP/M5450/D/22/3303370 there is no proposed link into the principal house as doing so would need to utilise an existing bedroom for access.

    In assessing this appeal, I have assessed the Council’s concerns regarding the impact of the proposed new front door upon the character and appearance of the area. I consider the main issue here is due to the perception of a new front door that would give the impression of a new, separate dwelling, being located here which could have some minor effect upon the legibility of the streetscene being composed of separate dwellings.

    However, I saw on my site visit that the wider area is very diverse in its architectural style where there is a great mix of both style and articulation of dwellinghouses. I also have evidence before me of several extensions or side garage structures locally that contain doors accessing onto the front of the property. This appears more common along [address] than [address] although there is a more mixed character along the latter.

    Ultimately, in terms of character and appearance I consider the cul de sac of [address] is well shielded from much of the area and as such the actual impact of a new, sensitively designed doorway, would not cause undue harm to the character and appearance of the area.

    When taking into account the modest impact of the proposed extension and associated door along with the personal benefits associated with the provision of accommodation for an elderly relative, I consider that Polices D3 (D1 and D(11) of the London Plan, [name] CS1 (B) of the [name], and Policy DM1 of the Harrow Development Management Policies Local Plan and the Supplementary Planning Document: [name] have been met and that the character and appearance of the area would not be harmed through this proposal.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given above, and taking into account of all other matters raised, I allow the appeal subject to the suggested conditions as set out in the Schedule below.

  5. Section 06

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans and documents: 01 (Site Plan); 01 ([name]) 01 ([name]) 02 ([name]); 02 ([name]);

  6. Section 07

    PLANNING STATEMENT

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any order revoking and re-enacting that order with or without modification), no window(s)/door(s) shall be installed in the side elevation(s) of the development hereby permitted without the prior permission in writing of the local planning authority.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Costs Decision

    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    4 November 2022 (page 1)
  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted decision date · page 1
    3 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    4 November 2022 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3303370
Application reference
p/0920/22
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Harrow
Planning authority code
E09000015

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
1,481 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
18 July 2022
Valid date
24 July 2022
Start date
31 August 2022
Planning authority decision date
28 April 2022
Appeal decision date
3 March 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
29200
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21