Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3303596

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

removal of existing side lean to and replace with two-storey side extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for removal of existing side lean to and replace with two storey side extension at [site address] , [site address] , Hertfordshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/00596/FHA, dated 22 February 2022, subject to the following conditions: (1) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. (2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the following approved plans: [name] 21016 AL (0) 001 (Location Plan), 21016 AL (0) 003 (Proposed Site Block Plan), 21016 AL (0) 110C (Proposed Ground Floor Plan), 21016 AL (0) 111D (Proposed First Floor Plan), 21016 AL (0) 112A (Proposed Roof Plan), 21016 AL (7) 001A ([name]), 21016 AL (7) 002A ([name]) and 21016 AL (0) 120D ([name] and Rear). (3) The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development permitted shall match those used in the existing dwelling as indicated on the approved drawings. These materials shall also be applied to the side elevation of the development facing the boundary with No [address] and the render and brick course on the side elevation shall align with the materials on the approved front and rear elevations.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    No existing or proposed side elevations were before the Council when it made its decision nor have any side elevation drawings been provided as part of this appeal. However, the proposed roof plan, floor plans and front and rear elevations provided give sufficient detail to understand the scale, form and appearance of the side elevation. Therefore, the absence of a side elevation has not prevented me from reaching a decision in this instance.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    [address] is characterised by mainly two-storey detached, often substantial dwellings which are set within generous plots. Dwellings are of a variety of designs and are set back from front boundaries. Gaps usually exist between the side elevations of neighbouring dwellings although the extent of these gaps varies. Mature landscaping is common within gardens and often lines front boundaries. These factors give the area an attractive appearance and an overriding spacious and verdant character.

    The appeal dwelling has been previously extended. Its side elevations sit close to the side boundaries of the site. Even so, the relative alignment and gaps between neighbouring dwellings, the spacious frontages and the mature planted front boundaries ensure that the dwelling and its neighbours complement the defining characteristics of the area.

    The proposal would give the front elevation of the host dwelling a pleasant degree of symmetry. I accept that it would increase the bulk of the dwelling at first floor level in close proximity to the boundary with No [address]. Even so, the extension would be clearly distinguishable from the dwelling at No 18 due to the contrasting designs and the relative alignment of these dwellings to the street. The spacious frontages to this section of the street and the subservient design means that the extension would not have an imposing presence in the street scene. In addition, the planting along [address] would also heavily filter views of the development. The generous spacing between the side elevations of the host dwelling and No 18 would also remain evident to passers-by, particularly in views through the access point to No 18.

    Taking all the above factors into account, the development would effectively assimilate into the street scene.

    I conclude, the development would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area. In that regard, it would comply with the design and character requirements of Policies CS11 (Quality of [name]) and CS12 (Quality of Site Design) of the Dacorum Borough Council Core Strategy (2013) (CS) and [name] 3 and 7 of the Dacorum Borough Local Plan (2004). For the same reasons, the proposal would also accord with the requirements to achieve well-designed placed in the National Planning Policy Framework.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    I attach the standard timescale for implementation as well as a condition listing the approved drawings in the interests of certainty. I have also attached a condition requiring the external materials to match the existing dwelling. In the absence of a side elevation, it is necessary to include a requirement for the materials on the side elevation to align with and match those on the front and rear elevations in the interests of protecting the character and appearance of the host dwelling and its surroundings.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 121No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    15 May 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    8 March 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3303596
Application reference
22/00596/FHA
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Dacorum Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000096

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
16 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
Yes
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
21 July 2022
Valid date
21 July 2022
Start date
7 December 2022
Planning authority decision date
27 May 2022
Appeal decision date
15 May 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
32590
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21