Appeal 3304096
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as a balcony and additional screening (part retrospective).
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed, and planning permission is granted for the balcony and additional screening at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/01094/HSE, dated 12 March 2022, subject to the conditions set out in the attached schedule.
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
As set out on the application form, development has started with the balcony installed. However, further alterations are proposed to include privacy screening. My assessment of the proposal is therefore based on the plans before the Council at the time of the planning application. I will refer to the ‘proposed development’ throughout my decision, although certain aspects may already be constructed.
Since the Council made its decision, the [name] Planning Document 2019 (the SPD) has been revoked with immediate effect. Therefore, any reference to this SPD in the reasons for refusal are no longer relevant. In reaching my decision I have not had regard to this document.
Section 04
[name]
The main issues are the effect of the proposed development on both the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring occupants with particular reference to outlook and privacy.
Section 05
Character and Appearance
The proposed development would be to the rear with limited visibility from public vantage points. It would be of lightweight metal and glass construction and while this contrasts with the bricks and tile of the existing building, it would add some interest while complementing the existing Juliet balcony serving the upper floor dormer window.
There appears to be no other immediate examples of balconies elsewhere. However, in this case, given the proposed development’s modest design and limited visibility against the existing dwelling and the wider area, it would not cause unacceptable visual harm to the character and appearance of the area.
Accordingly, it would comply with the relevant provisions of Policies SP1.1, SP4.1, SP4.2 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 (the Local Plan) and Policy D3 of the London Plan 2021 (the London Plan). All of which seek, amongst other things, to ensure that development is sympathetic to the character and appearance of the area.
Section 06
Living Conditions
Obscure glazed glass screens would be erected to either side of the balcony to a height of 1.8 metres. Such screening would significantly reduce opportunities for overlooking to the neighbouring dwellinghouses and the most sensitive areas of the gardens too.
While some overlooking would still be possible, this would be no greater than the existing pattern of overlooking. As such and subject to the installation of the privacy screens (to be controlled via condition), the proposed development would not cause any unacceptable loss of privacy to neighbouring occupants when compared to existing levels.
Given its modest design and separation from the boundaries, the proposed development would also not create a sense of encroachment or unacceptably effect outlook when viewed from neighbouring land.
The proposed development would therefore have an acceptable effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants with particular reference to outlook and privacy. The proposal would therefore accord with the relevant provisions of Policy D3 of the London Plan and Policies SP4 and DM10.6 of the Local Plan. These, amongst other things, address the need for high quality design therefore respecting the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers.
Section 07
Conditions
The Council has suggested a list of conditions which I have considered and where necessary amended in line with national policy and guidance. In the interest of certainty, conditions specifying the approved plans are required.
To ensure that the development is in keeping with the character and appearance of the area a condition controlling external materials is required. It is also necessary to protect the living conditions of those living near to the site and to impose fire safety measures.
As the development is part-retrospective I have placed a time limit on completing the screening and for these same reasons have not implemented a commencement condition.
Section 08
Conclusion
For the above reasons, having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other relevant considerations, the appeal is allowed.
The development shall be completed and retained entirely in accordance with the following approved drawings: Location Plan and P/B1.
Unless otherwise specified in the application, the materials to be used for the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be carried out in materials to match those of the existing building and retained as such.
The development shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of the [name] dated 15 March 2022 and retained as such.
Within 4 months of the date of this decision, the obscured glass screening to the sides must be installed, fully operational and, thereafter, retained and maintained for the life of the development. End of Schedule
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 1630No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 27 April 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 18 April 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3304096
- Application reference
- 22/01094/HSE
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Croydon
- Planning authority code
- E09000008
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 1
- Site in Green Belt
- Yes
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 28 July 2022
- Valid date
- 28 July 2022
- Start date
- 24 August 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 10 May 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 27 April 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 31873
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:26
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21