Skip to main content
Official casework recordDismissedCurrent release

Appeal 3304114

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as “single storey rear extension at 4 metres”

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is dismissed.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    The appeal site is referred to variously within the appeal documents as ’ [site address] ’ and ’53 [name]. As the latter address was used on both the planning application form and the Council’s decision notice, I have used it also.

    Although the Council used an amended description of development on the decision notice, it is unclear whether this change was agreed. Accordingly, I have taken the description from the planning application form.

    The appellant has been afforded opportunity to provide grounds for the appeal but has not done so. Therefore, I have determined the appeal on this basis, having regard to the Council’s evidence and statutory instruments, and no party has been prejudiced by my doing so.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is whether the proposal would constitute permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (‘the GPDO 2015’).

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    Under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO 2015, planning permission is granted for the enlargement of a dwellinghouse subject to limitations and conditions. However, Article 3(4) of the GPDO 2015 states that it does not permit development contrary to any condition imposed by planning permission otherwise than by the GPDO 2015.

    The Council indicates, and it is not disputed by the appellant, that planning permission1 for the appeal property was granted on 14 November 1974 and that Condition 5 of this permission states; “Notwithstanding the provision of Article 3 of the Town and Country Planning, General Development Order 1973, or any subsequent order, the permitted development allowed under Class I and II to Schedule 1 shall not extend to the development hereby approved.”

    The GPDO 2015 is an order subsequent to the Town and Country Planning, General Development Order 1973 (‘the GPDO 1973’). Class I and II to Schedule 1 of the GPDO 1973 included development within the curtilage of dwellinghouses. Schedule 2, Part 1 of the GPDO 2015 also relates to such development.

    Therefore, on the basis of the evidence before me, the limitations set out in Condition 5 of planning permission N6/755/74 continue to apply to the appeal property and having regard to Article 3(4) of the GPDO 2015, the appeal proposal would not benefit from the permitted development rights given by Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO 2015. Therefore, planning permission is required for the proposal.

    Given the above, it is not necessary for me to consider the prior approval element relating to the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of any adjoining premises.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    For the reasons given, the appeal is dismissed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 2837No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    10 July 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    26 June 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3304114
Application reference
6/2022/1358/PN8
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Planning authority code
E07000241

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
3. Refused prior approval of permitted development rights
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
25 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Dismissed
Decision category
Dismissed
Received date
28 July 2022
Valid date
28 September 2022
Start date
7 February 2023
Planning authority decision date
12 July 2022
Appeal decision date
10 July 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
35341
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21