Appeal 3306496
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as “Construction of a first floor front extension, construction of a rear two storey extension, external renovation of dwelling, internal and external alterations”.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the construction of a first floor front extension, construction of a rear two storey extension, external renovation of dwelling, internal and external alterations at [site address] , Chilworth, Surrey [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/P/00237, dated 9 February 2022, subject to the attached schedule of conditions.
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
I have used the description given on the original application form.
Since the appeal was lodged the Council has adopted the Guildford Borough Local Plan: Development Management Policies (LPDMP) Adopted 22 March
The policies in the LPDMP supersede policies from the Guildford Borough Local Plan 2003, which were included in the Council’s reason for refusal of the planning application. An opportunity has been given for the parties to comment on its significance for the appeal. I am required to determine the appeal on the basis of the development plan and national policy which are in place at the time of my decision and accordingly I have determined the appeal on that basis.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area.
Section 05
Reasons
[site address] is a detached chalet style dwelling situated at the top of a residential cul-de-sac. The existing dwelling incorporates a rear flat roof dormer, and sits within a spacious plot which is heavily landscaped to its side and rear boundaries.
The Council raised no objection to the front extension to the dwelling. Based on the plans, and as observed at my site visit, the proposed front extension would be in-keeping with the existing dwelling and wider streetscene and I have no reason to disagree.
Whilst the proposed rear extension would cover the majority of the rear roof slope it would sit below, and in, from the existing ridge height and width of the existing house. As such the extension would be a subservient addition to the host dwelling. In addition, it would appear well-balanced with the rear elevation and the incorporation of a mono-pitched roof would be in character with the proposed front extension. On this basis the proposed development incorporates design features as set out within the Guilford Borough Council Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (SPD).
The heavily landscaped boundaries to the rear and sides of the garden provide effective screening of the appeal site. Given the orientation of the site in relation to adjacent dwellings the proposed rear extension would have a negligible visual impact upon the occupiers of the neighbouring dwellings. Any views of the proposed rear extension from the streetscene, would be limited and insignificant upon the character and appearance of the area given that other dwellings within the cul-de-sac have various extensions of similar design and scale to the appeal proposal.
An indication of the materials to be used in the external elevations has been provided. Subject to a condition regarding the precise materials of external finish being agreed I consider the proposed development would assimilate with the existing dwelling and streetscene.
For the above reasons, I consider that the proposed rear extension would respect the scale, form and character of the existing property and properties within the surrounding vicinity in which it sits.
The site is located within the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The dwelling is also situated in an Area of [name] (AGLV), an area designated as being of high visual quality, worthy of conservation. The proposed design of the scheme has been considered having regard to these designations. It is considered that the proposal would only make minor changes in an already built-up area and would not harm the AONB or the distinctive character of the AGLV itself. The Council has not raised any concerns in this respect and even when giving great weight to conserving and enhancing landscape and scenic beauty, as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), I see no reason to disagree.
I therefore conclude that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area. Accordingly, I find no conflict with Policy D1 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan: Strategy and Sites 2015-2034 (adopted 2019), Policies H4 and D4 of the LPDMP. Collectively these require developments to be respectful, proportional and reflect patterns of development and distinct local character. I also find no conflict with the objectives of the SPD or the Framework which seek high quality design.
Section 06
Conditions
I have imposed the standard time condition and a plans condition for certainty. In the interest of the character and appearance of the dwelling and the surrounding area a condition to agree the precise finish for the external materials is necessary.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons set out above, the proposal would accord with the development plan, when read as a whole. There are no material considerations, including the Framework which indicate a decision should be made other than in accordance with the development plan. Having considered all other matters raised, I therefore conclude that the appeal should be allowed.
Section 08
Schedule of Conditions
The development hereby permitted shall begin no later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: PL-001 Rev 1 – Location plan PL-002 Rev 1 – block plan PL-009 Rev 1 – Proposed ground floor plan PL-010 Rev 1 – Proposed first floor plan PL-011 Rev 1 – Proposed roof plan PL-012 Rev 1 – Proposed west elevation PL-013 Rev 1 – Proposed east elevation PL-014 Rev 1 – Proposed north & south elevations
No development shall commence until details and samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. ***End of Schedule***
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 4617No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 12 July 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 24 May 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3306496
- Application reference
- 22/P/00237
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000209
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Yes
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 7 September 2022
- Valid date
- 7 September 2022
- Start date
- 29 November 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 12 July 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 35467
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21