Appeal 3307052
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
8 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as GF floor rear extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for ground and first floor rear extension at [site address] , [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 00344/2/P7, dated 23 February 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings ASB874 – 05HPA; ASB874 – 04HPA; ASB874 – 03HPA; ASB874 – 05HPA ([name]) and Fire Strategy Plan.
The external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be constructed in the materials shown on plan no. ASB874 – 04HPA.
Section 03
Preliminary Matters
I understand that “GF” in the description of development on the application form refers to ground and first floors. I have used that in my decision for clarity.
Section 04
Main Issue
The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance the area.
Section 05
Character and appearance
[site address] is a two-storey semi-detached dwelling on the corner of [address] and [address]. The area is predominantly residential in character, although other nearby uses include a primary school and retail units. The buildings in the area are mainly a mixture of painted render or brick. The main house is rendered except for the rear elevation at ground floor level which is brick. The garden wall which runs along the boundary with [address] is red brick and immediately abuts the rear of the dwellinghouse. There is a substantial garden building within the curtilage constructed from brick and visible from [address].
The proposed ground floor extension would replace an existing veranda, to the rear of the side extension and immediately abutting [address]. That veranda is constructed from lightweight materials, open at the rear, and does not reflect the character or appearance of the existing house. The proposal would be of more substantial construction, using brick and tile to reflect the ground floor of the existing house and boundary wall. As a result, it would better reflect the character and appearance of the existing house.
The London Borough of [name] Planning Document Adopted 20th December 2017 (SPD) states that if a house is on a corner plot with a road or footpath beside it, extensions should be set back at least 1m from the side boundary. This extension would be contrary to the SPD in this regard. However, considering the existing verandah which abuts the highway, and the character of the area, I consider that would be acceptable in this case. Furthermore, it would be subservient to the main house.
Having regard to materials, the proposed extension would effectively be in the position of the existing garden wall with a slight increase in height, therefore from the street would not appear incongruous. Both brick and render are used on the host property, within the curtilage and in the wider area and therefore brick is an acceptable material.
The proposed extension to the first floor is modest in size and would be finished in render. Due to the size, design and materials of the proposed first floor extension it would be acceptable.
For these reasons, I conclude that the proposed development would not be out of scale, incongruous or have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the area. Policies CC1 and CC2 of the London Borough of Hounslow Local Plan 2015-2030 [name] (LP) require new developments to respond to their local vernacular, context and meaningfully and sensitively to the site and Policy SC7 of the LP requires extensions to have regard to the quality, character, materials, and scale of the principal building. I find that the proposal accords with the aforementioned policies and the principles of the Framework that seeks good design sympathetic to the local area.
Section 06
Conditions
To meet legislative requirements, a condition shall be imposed to address the period for commencement. I shall also impose conditions for the following
Section 07
reasons.
I shall impose a condition specifying the relevant drawings, including [name] and [name] as required by the development plan, in order to provide certainty. A condition is necessary for materials to be in accordance with those set out on the approved drawings to maintain the character and appearance of the area.
Section 08
Conclusion
For the reasons set out having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 5290No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 21 March 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 8 February 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3307052
- Application reference
- 00344/2/P7
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Hounslow
- Planning authority code
- E09000018
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 1 m²
- Number of residences
- 1
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 15 September 2022
- Valid date
- 15 September 2022
- Start date
- 21 October 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 4 July 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 21 March 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 29983
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:26
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21