Appeal 3309152
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
5 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
described as alterations to the roof including the insertion of a front dormer window, the enlargement of the existing side dormer window and the insertion of another side dormer window.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for alterations to the roof including the insertion of a front dormer window, the enlargement of the existing side dormer window and the insertion of another side dormer window at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, 6/2022/1719/HOUSE dated 20 July 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, [name]: 1576_300, 1576_301,1576_303 and 1576_324.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and the appeal property itself.
Section 04
Reasons
The site is within a predominantly residential area. Some properties in the area have been extended or altered and designs of properties vary, notwithstanding this there is a harmony to design and materials of the properties within the immediate area.
The appeal property is a detached bungalow and has a small side dormer window. The proposal would increase the size of the side dormer window to cover the majority of the side roof slope, a similar dormer widow is proposed on the other side roof. A dormer extension is also proposed to the front.
The Council’s Supplementary Design Guidance (the SDG) states that dormer windows should be contained in the roof slope, be set in at least 1metre from the flank wall, and not extend beyond the ridge of the existing dwelling. The proposed development would not comply with the SDG.
Notwithstanding this, it is important to recognise that such guidance does not constitute a ‘black and white’ set of rules to be applied rigidly or exclusively when other material considerations indicate that an exception may be appropriate.
The proposal would add bulk to the modest size of the existing property. [name] observed during my site visit that properties in the area vary in terms of design, and that side and front dormer windows are a common design feature within the area. Whilst large, the dormers would be similar in terms of location, size and design to others within the immediate area.
Due to the similarities of the appeal proposal to others in the area I find that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area nor the appeal property itself.
There is no conflict with Policies D1 and D2 of the Welwyn Hatfield District Plan (2005) and Policy SP9 of the Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council - Draft Local Plan Proposed Submission August 2016 which seek amongst other things to ensure development is of high standard of design responding positively to the character and context of an area.
There is no conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) which seeks amongst other things to ensure developments are of good design appropriate and sympathetic to their surroundings.
Section 05
Conclusion and Conditions
For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.
I have attached the standard time limit condition and a plans condition as this provides certainty. I have also added a condition concerning materials to ensure a satisfactory appearance.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 2 February 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 12 January 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3309152
- Application reference
- 6/2022/1719/HOUSE
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Welwyn Hatfield Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000241
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 17 October 2022
- Valid date
- 25 October 2022
- Start date
- 5 December 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 2 February 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 27540
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:26
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21