Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3309152

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as alterations to the roof including the insertion of a front dormer window, the enlargement of the existing side dormer window and the insertion of another side dormer window.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for alterations to the roof including the insertion of a front dormer window, the enlargement of the existing side dormer window and the insertion of another side dormer window at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, 6/2022/1719/HOUSE dated 20 July 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, [name]: 1576_300, 1576_301,1576_303 and 1576_324.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and the appeal property itself.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The site is within a predominantly residential area. Some properties in the area have been extended or altered and designs of properties vary, notwithstanding this there is a harmony to design and materials of the properties within the immediate area.

    The appeal property is a detached bungalow and has a small side dormer window. The proposal would increase the size of the side dormer window to cover the majority of the side roof slope, a similar dormer widow is proposed on the other side roof. A dormer extension is also proposed to the front.

    The Council’s Supplementary Design Guidance (the SDG) states that dormer windows should be contained in the roof slope, be set in at least 1metre from the flank wall, and not extend beyond the ridge of the existing dwelling. The proposed development would not comply with the SDG.

    Notwithstanding this, it is important to recognise that such guidance does not constitute a ‘black and white’ set of rules to be applied rigidly or exclusively when other material considerations indicate that an exception may be appropriate.

    The proposal would add bulk to the modest size of the existing property. [name] observed during my site visit that properties in the area vary in terms of design, and that side and front dormer windows are a common design feature within the area. Whilst large, the dormers would be similar in terms of location, size and design to others within the immediate area.

    Due to the similarities of the appeal proposal to others in the area I find that the proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area nor the appeal property itself.

    There is no conflict with Policies D1 and D2 of the Welwyn Hatfield District Plan (2005) and Policy SP9 of the Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council - Draft Local Plan Proposed Submission August 2016 which seek amongst other things to ensure development is of high standard of design responding positively to the character and context of an area.

    There is no conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) which seeks amongst other things to ensure developments are of good design appropriate and sympathetic to their surroundings.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion and Conditions

    For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.

    I have attached the standard time limit condition and a plans condition as this provides certainty. I have also added a condition concerning materials to ensure a satisfactory appearance.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    2 February 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    12 January 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3309152
Application reference
6/2022/1719/HOUSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Planning authority code
E07000241

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
17 October 2022
Valid date
25 October 2022
Start date
5 December 2022
Planning authority decision date
12 September 2022
Appeal decision date
2 February 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
27540
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21