Appeal 3309925
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the erection of a front extension adding a utility room, extending cloak room into bathroom and adding a new porch.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of a front extension adding a utility room, extending cloak room into bathroom and adding a new porch at [site address] , Maldon, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/MAL/22/00627, dated 13 May 2022, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: [name]-01, PL-02, PL-03, PL-04, PL-05D [name] and PL-06D [name].
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 03
Application for Costs
An application for costs was made by [name] against Maldon District Council. This application is the subject of a separate decision.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal property is a detached, two-storey dwelling with a traditionally pitched gabled roof. It is sited on high ground above the levels of the highway and recessed behind a deep and steeply sloping front garden. [address] is a residential road comprising detached and semi-detached properties of broadly similar age dating from the 1960s and with a mix of repeat property styles. Despite alterations to the original forms of some dwellings, there is an openly perceived degree of repetition to the architecture, especially those most prominent on the higher ground to the east side of [address], that imparts a pleasing sense of regimentation and harmony to the street scene.
The proposal would add a single-storey, lean-to extension to the front across approximately two-thirds the width of the property. The extension would project 2.75m forward of the existing building with the roof pitching up to just below the sill level of a first-floor window, which would be marginally raised in height to accommodate the addition.
The front extension would unquestionably alter the appearance of the existing dwelling and, due to its elevated position, would be apparent when viewed from the public domain along [address]. However, it would be designed to complement the appearance and form of the existing. Due to its deeply recessed position, it would not intrude the vista along [address], and would only be seen head-on where it would be set against the backdrop of the existing building, which would remain dominant and would retain an overall scale, bulk and form that would be consistent with the other similar properties to this side of the road.
Together with the use of brickwork and tiles to match the existing, in my assessment the extension would appear as a largely unobtrusive addition that would have little effect of significance upon the wider established character of the street scene, which would be unharmed. Accordingly, I find no conflict with Policies S1, D1 or H4 of the Maldon District Approved Local Development Plan 2014 – 2029 (2017) as far as they seek to achieve high quality design that respects the local character and context of the area. For the same reasons there would be no conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework’s objectives for achieving well-designed places.
Section 06
Conditions
A condition specifying the relevant plans is necessary as this provides certainty. I have specifically excluded reference to [name]-07 in my condition despite it being a plan referenced on the Council’s decision notice. It was prepared to illustrate the fenestration patterns in the area but shows an alternative extension to No 5, which is not consistent with the proposal that is before me.
In the interests of maintaining the character and appearance of the area a condition is required to ensure that the proposed extension is finished with materials to match the existing building.
Section 07
Conclusion
For the reasons given, I find that there would be no harm to the character or appearance of the area. Accordingly, in the absence of any other conflict with the development plan, and having regard to all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 286No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 18 January 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 21 December 2022 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3309925
- Application reference
- HOUSE/MAL/22/00627
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Maldon District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000074
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 28 October 2022
- Valid date
- 28 October 2022
- Start date
- 18 November 2022
- Planning authority decision date
- 24 August 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 18 January 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 26678
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:26
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21