Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3311938

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

9 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

alterations and extensions.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for alterations and extensions at [site address] , Village Street, Oasby [postcode] in accordance with the terms of application reference S22/0133, dated 21 January 2022 subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Application for Costs

    An application for costs was made by [name] against South Kesteven District Council. This application is the subject of a separate decision.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect on the setting of Oasby Conservation Area and the setting of Listed Buildings of [address], [address] and [address].

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a detached stone bungalow with pantile roof positioned within a large plot set back from the highway and located within the centre of Oasby. Situated within the Oasby Conservation Area, the area around the appeal site is generally characterised by properties that sit in fairly generous plots. The properties are a mix of one, 1.5 and 2 storeys, with some featuring dormer windows. Tree lined grassed verges create an open rural character.

    There are a number of Listed Buildings close to the site. [address] is a [name]* Listed Building which dates from the 17th Century. It incorporates some reused 15th Century work with substantial 19th Century alterations. [address] is a [name] cottage dating from the 17th Century with 19th and 20th Century alterations. [address] is a [name] 17th Century house with substantial 19th Century additions and alterations. The importance of the Listed Buildings derive in part from their age and distinctive appearance.

    The proposal would increase the height and floor space area of the property. While it would add to the bulk and massing of the dwelling it would not be out of proportion to other properties in the area and would not be excessively substantial in the context of the plot size. The location of the dwelling within the plot means that it would not be overly dominant within the street scene. The design features of the proposal including the roof line, dormer windows and choice of materials such as stone, pantile tiles, wooden windows and side hung garage doors and metal rainwater goods mean that the development would not be out of keeping with that part of the Conservation Area.

    The dwelling would be set back within the site some distance from the nearby listed buildings. This and the limited intervisibility between the relevant buildings leads me to agree with the Council’s Conservation officer and the findings of the Heritage Impact Assessment that there would not be any harm to the setting of any nearby Listed Buildings.

    The development would not harm the Oasby Conservation Area or the setting of [address], [address] or [address]. It would not therefore conflict with the part of Policy EN6 of the South Kesteven District Council Local Plan 2011-2036 (Local Plan) which identifies that proposals that would conserve or enhance the significance of a heritage asset shall be considered favourable.

    It would also not conflict with Policy DE1 of the Local Plan which amongst other things states that new development is expected to make a positive contribution to local distinctiveness, vernacular and character of an area and be appropriate in terms of scale, massing, height and materials. In addition, the policy requires the retention of important on site features such as trees. There would also be no conflict with the relevant parts of the [name] for Rutland and [name] and the Rutland County Council Extension to Dwellings Supplementary Planning Document.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    Concern has been raised regarding the impact of the development on the living conditions of a neighbouring dwelling with regards overlooking and privacy. Two dormer windows are proposed on the south elevation facing towards [address]. However given the separation distance between the 2 dwellings and the fact that there would be no direct views into habitable rooms there would be no harm to the living conditions of the neighbouring dwelling.

    Amendments have been made to the design of the property to protect trees important to the rural character of the Conservation Area. I agree with the findings of the tree survey and the assessment of the Council’s tree officer that there would be no harm caused to the trees subject to an appropriately worded planning condition which protects the trees at and just outside the site boundary during site clearance and the construction phase and requires temporary protection barriers and ground guards for the duration of the works.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Conditions

    For the reasons identified I conclude that the appeal should be allowed and planning permission should be granted subject to necessary planning

  7. Section 08

    conditions.

    In attaching conditions I am mindful of paragraph 56 of the National Planning Policy Framework which states that they should only be imposed where they are necessary, relevant to planning and to the development to be permitted, enforceable, precise and reasonable in all other respects.

    In addition to the standard time limitations for commencement, I have imposed a condition specifying the relevant drawings as this provides certainty. Conditions relating to verges, eaves, rooflights, external joinery and materials, garage doors and window and door heads is necessary to protect the character and appearance of the area and the Oasby Conservation Area. A requirement to adhere to the [name] is necessary to protect trees on and close to the site.

  8. Section 09

    SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS

    The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this permission.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following list of approved plans: 21-2542-P-04 Site Location Plan received 21 January 2022 and 21-2542-P-02E [name], [name] and [name] received 6 July 2022 unless otherwise required by another condition of this permission.

    Before any construction occurs above ground level, details of the treatment of verges and eaves hereby permitted shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out only in accordance with the agreed verges and eaves details.

    Before any construction occurs above ground level, samples or detailed specifications of all external materials (clay pantiles and stone) to be used on the development hereby permitted shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter, the development shall be carried out only in accordance with the agreed materials.

    The tree protection measures as detailed in the [name] (East Midlands Tree Surveys Ltd received 21 January 2022 shall be adhered to at all times during the construction phase.

    Before any window or door heads and cills are installed, details of their design, material and construction, in the form of scale drawings and material samples/ specifications, shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out only in accordance with the agreed heads and cills details.

    All rooflights hereby permitted shall be conservation style rooflights set as flush as practicable within the roof slope.

    All new external joinery including windows and doors shall be of a timber construction only which shall be retained for the lifetime of the development. Prior to their installation, details of their design, specification, method of opening, method of fixing and finish, in the form of large scale drawings and sections (EG 1:20), shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out only in accordance with the agreed details.

    The garage doors shall be of timber construction, side hung, and outward opening, details of which shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The garage doors shall then be installed in accordance with the approved details and retained for the lifetime of the development.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 3546No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    22 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    16 February 2023 (page 1)
  • Costs Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 3546No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    22 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    16 February 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3311938
Application reference
S22/0133
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
South Kesteven District Council
Planning authority code
E07000141

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
189 m²
Number of residences
1
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Yes
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
25 November 2022
Valid date
25 November 2022
Start date
23 January 2023
Planning authority decision date
24 October 2022
Appeal decision date
22 March 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Yes
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
30061
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21