Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3312115

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described as demolition of existing boundary walls to the front garden. New boundary walls to form shed with new metal gates and planter.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for demolition of existing boundary walls to the front garden. New boundary walls to form shed with new metal gates and planter at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/03858/HSE, dated 16 September 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following

  2. Section 03

    conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, drawings: FOX-30001 P2, 31000 P7 and 30000 P1.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    I consider the main issue to be the effect of the proposed outbuilding on the street scene and thereby the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal property, [site address] , is a semi-detached house, located in a residential area comprising detached and semi-detached dwellings along with three storey flatted developments. The appeal site has previously been sub-divided to facilitate new residential development to the rear.

    The appellant proposes the demolition of the existing boundary walls to the front and side of the front garden and the erection of new 0.6 metre high boundary walls. The front wall would be in the form of a planter for a hedge with the side wall having metal railings on top. A 2.5 metre high flat roof brick cycle shed is proposed behind the front wall/planter and hedge. 2.15 meter metal gates are planned to the new drive, located deep into the site.

    The Council raise no objection to the proposed front and side walls, planters, gates and hedge. From what I have seen and read I would not form a contrary view.

    The proposed shed which would be of a simple contemporary uncluttered design would be 4.5 metres deep and 3.5 metres wide and 2.5 metres high. It would be well screened from public view by the soft landscaping approved for the neighbouring development and the new hedges proposed here.

    I appreciate that there are no other front garden buildings in the gardens of neighbouring properties close to the appeal site. Nevertheless, such outbuildings and garages are typical features of residential development. On balance and as the building would be part of a comprehensive development scheme and would be well screened, I do not consider that this modest structure would cause harm to the street scene or wider area.

    I therefore conclude in respect of the main issue that the proposed development would, in my judgement, overall make a positive contribution to the street scene and surrounding area. It would therefore accord with the objectives of Policy D3 of the London Plan ([name] 2021) and Policies SP4 and DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan 2018 (Adopted 27 February 2018) as they relate, amongst other things to the quality of development and the need to create well defined and designed private spaces.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    The conditions follow from those suggested by the Council. To ensure a high quality development, I shall include a condition about the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the building.

    In the interests of certainty, I shall impose a condition requiring the development to be undertaken in accordance with the approved plans.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusions

    For the reasons given above and having regard to all other matters raised, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1184No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    2 February 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    5 January 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3312115
Application reference
22/03858/HSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Croydon
Planning authority code
E09000008

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
15 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
29 November 2022
Valid date
29 November 2022
Start date
14 December 2022
Planning authority decision date
14 November 2022
Appeal decision date
2 February 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
27563
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21