Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3312347

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

described in the application form as a “[name] porch with interlocking clay tiles to match existing roof; Porch to be external finished with brick plinth to 665mm and externally clad above”.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a “[name] porch with interlocking clay tiles to match existing roof; Porch to be external finished with brick plinth to 665mm and externally clad above”, at number [site address] , Essex [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application (reference 22/01464/FULHH, dated 30 August 2022), subject to the conditions set out in the attached Schedule of Conditions.

  2. Section 03

    Main issue

    The main issue to be determined in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and its surroundings.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    Frinton is a substantial town on the Essex coast. The commercial centre is set inland from the beach but residential development extends along the shore, with a wide area of beach and parkland between the edge of the built-up area and the sea itself.

    [address] is set inland from the sea, parallel to Esplanade, which runs alongside the Greensward park and gardens, behind the beach. There is a long established area of residential development between the two roads and the buildings are varied in age and style (sometimes with more elaborate detailing), with most dating from the late nineteenth or earlier twentieth centuries but with some later additions to the housing. The properties are also varied in scale, with some flats but also with a range of dwelling sizes. Appeal Decision: APP/P1560/D/22/3312347

    The appeal site is located on the north-west side of [address], in a residential frontage, although numbers 1, 3 and 5 are relatively small in scale whereas numbers 7 and 9, for example, are much larger houses. Number 5 is smaller than some others in the vicinity, therefore, and it has the appearance of a modest bungalow, with some accommodation at first floor, served by a large flat-roofed dormer on the front elevation of the pitched roof. The main part of the building is finished with render, with a pitched roof that is finished with interlocking roof tiles.

    Alongside the main part of the existing house, there is an attached side element that is set back from the line of the main front elevation. Although this section adjoins the main part of the house, its ridgeline and roof slopes are orientated at right-angles to the front boundary, creating a sense of separation between the two parts of the building, when viewed from the highway.

    It is now proposed to extend the house by constructing a new porch at the front of the existing side element.

    The ‘National Planning Policy Framework’ emphasises the aim of “achieving well designed places” in the broadest sense (notably at Section 12), while making effective use of land and encouraging economic activity. It is aimed at achieving good design standards generally, by adding to the overall quality of the area and being visually attractive and sympathetic to local character and history (while not preventing or discouraging appropriate innovation or change).

    Policies in the Development Plan also share these basic planning principles. The most relevant elements of the Development Plan, for the purposes of this appeal are Sections 1 and 2 of the ‘Tendring District Council 2013-33 and Beyond Local Plan’ (which were adopted in January 2021 and January 2022, respectively). In Section 1, Policy SP 7 is concerned with “[name]” and seeks to ensure that new development will achieve high standards of design, among other things, responding positively to local character and context and producing well designed buildings. In Section 2, Policy SPL3 is similarly aimed at achieving good design and enhancing or preserving local character.

    The new porch would largely infill a corner of the house, between the main front elevation of the house and the front wall of the side element. It would have a traditional pitched roof, although the roof slope would be different from that of the existing side element, which is relatively steep. A new valley would be created alongside the gable of the main part of the building and the new construction would be set back from the line of the front of the building, thus preserving its separate character and emphasising its subsidiary nature.

    The materials to be used in the external surfaces of the new extension would match existing materials (even though the specific detail of the proposed new door has not been finalised) and it would incorporate a variety of materials in a small scale construction.

    The proposed extension would be very modest in scale and would be subservient in appearance to the host building. The proposed forms and materials to be employed would be in harmony with the host building and its surroundings. The proposed variation in roof pitches would create a somewhat 2 Appeal Decision: APP/P1560/D/22/3312347 quirky image but the overall effect would be in harmony with the varied surroundings and in keeping with the seaside character. In consequence, I am persuaded that the proposed extension would not detract from the character or appearance of the host building and that it would preserve the local character of the area.

    Evidently, the appeal site lies within an established urban area, which is “sustainable” in planning terms, and the proposed extension would be a useful, if very minor, addition to the accommodation at number [site address] . I have concluded that the project would not be in conflict with the Development Plan and I am persuaded that the scheme before me can properly be permitted, subject to conditions. [name] have considered all the matters that have been raised in the representations I have found nothing to cause me to alter my decision.

    I have, however, also considered the need for conditions and, in imposing conditions, I have taken account of the conditions suggested by the Council in the usual way (without prejudice to their main arguments in the appeal). I accept that conditions are necessary, to define the planning permission and to ensure that quality is maintained.

  4. Section 05

    SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS

    The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved drawings: drawing number 0023-A-001 (Location & Block Plan); drawing number 0023-A-002 (Proposed Outline Plan); drawing number 0023-A-100 ([name]); drawing number 0023-A-200 ([name]).

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building. 4

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 285No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    29 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    8 March 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3312347
Application reference
22/01464/fulhh
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Tendring District Council
Planning authority code
E07000076

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
9 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
1 December 2022
Valid date
1 December 2022
Start date
9 February 2023
Planning authority decision date
14 October 2022
Appeal decision date
29 March 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
30495
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21