Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3314080

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

construction of elevated walkway incorporating balustrade.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for Construction of elevated walkway incorporating balustrade at [site address] , [site address] , Lancashire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, 322/01378/FUL dated 7 November 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans, Location plan entitled [site address] , [site address] , Lancashire, [postcode] , Drg. No’s: A3-02 Rev.B, P01, P02, P03, P04, P05 and P06.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall be in accordance with the application form.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No’s. [address] and 7A Woodlands.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The site is a detached property which is undergoing renovation. There is a larger rear extension expanding the full width of the property at the rear being constructed. This extension has floor to ceiling glazing on both the rear and side elevations. The rear garden of the site slopes away from the property significantly, due to the topography the extension and property are elevated.

    I observed during my site visit that there is a degree of mutual overlooking between properties in the area, and also noted that in the wider area balconies are not uncommon.

    The proposed walkway would extend from the existing pathway adjacent the boundary with 7A Woodlands wrapping around the rear extension and along the side of the property adjacent the boundary with [address].

    Due to the elevated position of the property and topography of the site it is obvious that the proposed development would provide views towards adjacent neighbouring properties. Notwithstanding this there is currently unrestricted views from the rear extension which has significant amounts of glazing on the rear and side elevations and from existing windows on the side elevations of the property.

    Whilst the walkway would project closer to the neighbouring properties, the rear extension and internal rooms allow overlooking all year around, unlike a walkway which the use of would reasonably be dependent on the weather.

    I find that the walkway would not exacerbate the existing situation and there would not be any additional loss of privacy to the occupiers of neighbouring properties.

    I conclude that the proposed development would not harm the living conditions of the occupiers of No’s. [address] and 7A Woodlands.

    There is no conflict with Policy DM29 of the A Local Plan for Lancaster District 2011-2031, [name]: Review of Development Management DPD (2020) which seeks amongst other things to ensure development protects the living conditions of neighbouring properties.

    There is also no conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) which seeks to ensure developments maintain a high standard of amenity for existing and future users.

  4. Section 05

    Conclusion and Conditions

    For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.

    I have attached the standard time limit condition and a plans condition as this provides certainty. I have also added a condition concerning materials to ensure a satisfactory appearance.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    28 March 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    2 March 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3314080
Application reference
22/01378/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Lancaster City Council
Planning authority code
E07000121

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
4 January 2023
Valid date
4 January 2023
Start date
2 February 2023
Planning authority decision date
22 December 2022
Appeal decision date
28 March 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
30408
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21