Appeal 3315089
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
9 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
the erection of an orangery/single storey extension to the rear of the property.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of an orangery/single storey extension to the rear of [site address] , Barrow, Lancashire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 3/2002/0917, dated 27 September 2022, subject to the following
Section 03
conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings Location Plan; Proposed Plan ([name]; [name]; Proposed Base Plan; Roof and [name]) and Block/Site Plan.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 04
Application for costs
An application for costs was made by [name] against Ribble Valley Borough Council. This application is the subject of a separate Decision.
Section 05
Main Issue
The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 06
Character and appearance
No. 2 is a detached dwelling which is part of a wider modern housing estate. It stands on the corner of [address] and [address] and has a side elevation that faces onto [address]. The property has an existing modest lean-to extension on the rear elevation.
The proposal would extend along the rear elevation immediately facing [address] and would have a flat roof with roof lanterns. The corner of the existing lean-to would be extended to allow the proposed extension to connect to the dwelling. The extension would not extend across the full width of the dwelling, giving a reasonable separation distance from the neighbouring property to the side, no. [address].
The proposed extension would introduce a long side elevation facing [address]. The design would be single storey with modest height, due to its size and flat roof design it would not be bulky and would integrate well with the host dwelling and would not dominate it. For these reasons, whilst the extension would be visible when viewed from the street, it would not be an incongruous addition that would be unduly harmful to the character and appearance of the area.
The design of the proposed extension would be contemporary and would add an additional feature to the rear elevation of the property which currently has a simple form and would not detract from the rear elevation of the property. The brickwork and colour of the windows would match those of the host dwelling. Therefore, the proposed extension would not cause undue harm to the character and appearance of the existing dwelling.
Accordingly, the proposal would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area. The extension would be compliant with Policies DMG1 and DMH5 of the [name] 2008-2028 A Local Plan for Ribble Valley Adoption Version – adopted 16 December 2014, which between them require new development to be sympathetic in terms of design, place emphasis on visual appearance and the relationship with surroundings and requires extensions to be capable of integration into the main dwelling.
The proposal accords with the Framework having regard to paragraph 130 which requires developments to be sympathetic to local character while not preventing or discouraging change.
Section 07
Other Matters
I note that the Council considered that the proposal did not affect the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers or highway safety, I have no reason to disagree with these conclusions based on the information provided and my observations. Therefore, this matter has a neutral effect on the overall planning balance.
The Council has provided the decision notice for a previously refused application at the site for a two-storey rear extension. Based on the limited information provided regarding this historic case, this relates to a two storey rear extension which would result in a larger, higher and more prominent scheme than the scheme before me. Therefore, there are material differences between that development and the proposal before me.
Section 08
Conditions
I have considered the conditions suggested by the Council. In addition to the standard time condition, in my judgement, conditions are also necessary in respect of ensuring the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans, in matching materials, to provide certainty and to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.
Section 09
Conclusion
For the reasons set out having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 5290No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 3 July 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 20 April 2023 (page 1)
Costs Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 5290No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 3 July 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 20 April 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3315089
- Application reference
- 3/2022/0917
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Ribble Valley Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000124
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 28 m²
- Number of residences
- 1
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 20 January 2023
- Valid date
- 20 January 2023
- Start date
- 21 February 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 18 November 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 3 July 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 34978
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21