Appeal 3315698
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
7 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
a single-storey rear extension.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single-storey rear extension at 1 The Kennels, [site address] , Norton, Kent [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/504138/FULL, dated 22 August 2022, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Site Plan, Block Plan and Existing and [name] and [name] ([name] PL001 Revision 5).
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.
The bond of brickwork used in the construction of the development hereby permitted shall match that used in the existing building.
Section 03
Procedural Matter
An amended plan was submitted during the course of the application. The Council made its decision against this plan and I shall determine the appeal on the same basis.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the surrounding area.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal site comprises part of a 19th Century former kennels building, which has been converted into six dwellings. No 1 The Kennels is located in one of two single-storey wings linked by a two-storey element, with an attractive courtyard to the centre. The building is detached from [site address] , to the rear of existing dwellings and beyond several mature trees.
The development proposes a single-storey rear extension. The extension would be positioned adjacent to an existing lean-to element, which is part of the neighbouring property. The proposed extension would be small in scale with a lower ridge height than the host dwelling. The scale and orientation of the extension would represent a sensitive addition that would preserve the linear form of the host dwelling. Furthermore, the use of matching external facing and roofing materials would ensure that the extension blends well with the host building. The development would therefore conserve the character and appearance of the former kennels building, particularly the pleasant courtyard on the opposing side of the host dwelling.
I acknowledge the content of the Supplementary Guidance, ‘The Conservation of [address] Buildings’, in particular paragraph 5.10 relating to extensions This states that it is not normally considered appropriate to extend traditional buildings. However, the guidance does not specifically prohibit the extension of such buildings and, as the proposed development would be a sympathetic addition and would preserve the character of the building, the proposal would accord with this guidance.
I conclude that the proposed extension would comprise a sympathetic and proportionate addition to the host dwelling and preserves the character and appearance of the site and the surrounding area. On this basis, the proposed development accords with [name] 11, DM 14 and DM 16 of the [name] 2031: The Swale Borough Local Plan 2017, which seek to ensure that extensions are of an appropriate scale, mass and appearance, respond positively to the style and character of the building being extended and preserve architectural and historic features of interest.
Section 06
Conditions
In addition to the standard time limit condition, I have imposed a condition requiring that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans. This is in the interests of certainty. In order to protect the character and appearance of the area, I have also imposed conditions requiring the external materials and the bond of brickwork used in the construction of the extension to match those of the existing building.
Section 07
Conclusion
The proposal would accord with the development plan as a whole and there are no other considerations, which would indicate that a decision should be made otherwise. Therefore, for the reasons given, I conclude that the appeal should be allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 20880No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 21 August 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 7 August 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3315698
- Application reference
- 22/504138/FULL
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Swale Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000113
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- 30 m²
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 30 January 2023
- Valid date
- 4 February 2023
- Start date
- 28 March 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 11 November 2022
- Appeal decision date
- 21 August 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 37449
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21