Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3317391

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

for roof space to habitable use to include rear dormer windows and a conservation roof light to the side elevation of main roof.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for roof space to habitable use to include rear dormer windows and a conservation roof light to the side elevation of main roof at [site address] , Havering, Romford [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref P1621.22 dated 04 October 2022, and the plans submitted with it subject to the following condition:

    Within one month of the date of this decision the roof-light installed to the side roof-slope shall be fitted with obscured glazing (not less than obscurity level 4), and no part of that window shall be capable of being opened. The window as permitted shall be retained thereafter.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matter

    At the time of my site visit, the development was complete. The application made clear that the scheme was submitted retrospectively, and I have dealt with the appeal on that basis.

    The Council reference the National Planning Policy Framework (2019) in the reason for refusal. This was superseded by a revised National Planning Policy Framework (2021) (the Framework). I note that the Appellant cites the revised Framework on this basis no party would be prejudiced or caused any injustice by me proceeding with the appeal in light of this minor discrepancy.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of Gidea Park Conservation Area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The site is within the Gidea Park Conservation Area. In accordance with the statutory duty imposed by section 72(1) of the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990; I am required to have special regard to the effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the area.

    The Conservation Area is characterised by predominantly individually designed early 20th century properties influenced by the arts and crafts movement within mature gardens. Properties vary in design and the mature planting in streets, gardens and open spaces contributes to the character and appearance of the area. The mature gardens, trees and boundary hedges form an integral part of the character of the Gidea Park Conservation Area, along with property designs influenced by the Arts and Crafts movement and materials used.

    The appeal site is a semi-detached property which has been extended and altered, however the property retains an influence of the Revival of Arts and Crafts details.

    I understand that a previous approval for the appeal site allowed dormer windows to the rear1, however due to a change to the internal arrangements a roof light was inserted into the side elevation of the main roof. The Council dose not raise issue with the dormer windows shown on the plans submitted, I do not disagree.

    Whilst the roof light is visible from public vantages points, I observed during my site visit that there are roof lights visible on other properties in the area, whilst this is not a common feature, they did not look incongruous nor affected the significance of the conservation area in general. The roof light at the appeal site is modest in size and does not compromise the contribution the property makes to the conservation area.

    In the absence of harm to the conservation areas character and appearance, I conclude that the proposal has a neutral effect upon the significance of the

  5. Section 06

    heritage asset.

    I conclude that the development would not harm the character and appearance of the Gidea Park Conservation Area. There is no conflict with Policy 28 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031 (2021) which amongst other things seek to achieve good design appropriate to the local context which conserve and enhance Conservation Areas.

    There is no conflict with the Framework which seeks amongst other things to ensure developments are of good design appropriate and sympathetic to their surroundings and that the historic environment is protected.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.

    Conditions relating to standard time limit for commencement of development, plans to be adhered to are not relevant or necessary as the development is complete.

    In the interest of privacy I have imposed a condition relating to obscure glazing and fixing closed the roof light on the side elevation of the main roof. 1 Application Reference: P0617.22

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    17 May 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    4 May 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3317391
Application reference
P1621.22
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Havering
Planning authority code
E09000016

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
26 February 2023
Valid date
26 February 2023
Start date
29 March 2023
Planning authority decision date
5 December 2022
Appeal decision date
17 May 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
32783
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:26
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21