Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3319356

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

erection of first floor rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for erection of first floor rear extension at [site address] , Birmingham, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 2023/00041/PA, dated 27 January 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Drawing no. 02; Drawing no. 03; Drawing no. 04; Drawing no. 05 and [name]. 10.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    [address] is a predominantly residential street characterised by short terraces set back from the highway with driveways to the frontages, in varying designs and materials, many of which have been altered. The appeal property is a mid-terrace property, and a number of neighbouring properties have flat roof dormer windows or flat roof extensions on their rear elevations.

    The proposed extension would be on the rear elevation at first floor level which would extend partially above an existing flat roofed single storey rear extension. The proposed extension would have a flat roof. The depth of the proposed extension would be modest and would provide for a bathroom and an extension to an existing bedroom within the property. The proposed fenestration would be in proportion of that of the existing dwelling.

    The rear elevation of the property would be visible from neighbouring properties due to the layout of the surrounding residential development. However, due to the scale of the proposed rear extension, design and proposed construction in matching materials, the extension would reflect the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and would not dominate it.

    The Council’s evidence refers to the cumulative impact of the developments in the area with reference to nearby flat roof extensions that may not have the benefit of planning permission. Notwithstanding the lawfulness of existing flat roof extensions of which I have no details, they do influence the character of the area. The scale of the proposal would be modest and other examples of similar flat roof or flat roof dormer extensions on properties within close proximity to the appeal site exist, including on the appeal site itself. Accordingly, it would not be an incongruous addition that would be out of keeping or unduly harmful to the character and appearance of the existing dwelling or the area.

    For these reasons, I conclude that the proposal would not have a detrimental effect on the character and appearance of the area. Policies PG3 of the Birmingham Plan 2031 – Birmingham Development Plan (adopted 2017) and DM2 of the Birmingham Plan 2031 – Development Management in Birmingham (adopted 2021) require new developments to reinforce local distinctiveness with design that responds to site conditions and to be appropriate to their location. I find that the proposal accords with the aforementioned policies and the principles of chapter 12 of the National Planning Policy Framework which seeks good design sympathetic to the local area.

    Having regard to the [name] – [name] (2022) (DG) it requires the design of household extensions to respond to and complement the character of the host building and its surroundings. For the reasons mentioned, the proposal is in accordance with the guidance contained in the DG.

  4. Section 05

    Other Matters

    The Council has concluded that the proposed development would not have an adverse impact on the living conditions of neighbouring properties and based on the evidence provided and my observations I have no reason to disagree with this. Therefore, this matter has a neutral effect on the overall planning balance.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    I have considered the conditions suggested by the Council. In addition to the standard time condition, in my judgement, conditions are also necessary in respect of ensuring the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans, in matching materials, to provide certainty and to safeguard the character and appearance of the area.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons set out having regard to the development plan as a whole and all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 5290No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    5 September 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    2 August 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3319356
Application reference
2023/00041/PA
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Birmingham City Council
Planning authority code
E08000025

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
28 March 2023
Valid date
28 March 2023
Start date
21 June 2023
Planning authority decision date
24 March 2023
Appeal decision date
5 September 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
38120
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21