Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3319688

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

9 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

prior approval for the construction of one additional storey to the existing dwelling, to increase the height to a maximum height of 8.62 metres.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed, and prior approval is given under the provisions of Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class AA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) for the construction of one additional storey to the existing dwelling, to increase the height to a maximum height of 8.62 metres at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/0500M, dated 5 February 2023, and the plans submitted with it.

  2. Section 03

    Appeal Procedure

    The site visit was undertaken by a representative of the Inspector whose recommendation is set out below and to which the Inspector has had regard before deciding the appeal.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is whether the proposal is permitted development.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons for the Recommendation

    Under Article 3(1) and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class AA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) (the GPDO), planning permission is granted for the enlargement of a dwellinghouse subject to limitations and conditions.

    The GPDO states that development is not permitted by Class AA where it falls within descriptions as set out in sub-paragraphs AA.1 (a) to (k). It is common ground that the proposals accord with all of the above sub-paragraphs with the exception of sub-paragraph (d) and I have no reason to disagree with that

  5. Section 06

    assessment.

    Sub-paragraph (d) sets out that development is not permitted by Class AA if ‘the existing dwellinghouse has been enlarged by the addition of one or more storeys above the original dwellinghouse, whether in reliance on the permission granted by Class AA or otherwise’. The GPDO definition of a ‘storey’, at paragraph AA4. (2 (b)), does not include any accommodation within the roof of a dwellinghouse, whether comprising part of the original dwellinghouse or created by a subsequent addition or alteration.

    In considering what comprises an additional storey to the dwelling, I have had regard to the application and approved drawings from planning permission reference 06/0934P. From these drawings this development was a roof alteration including dormers, to create additional accommodation. Taking into account the definition of a storey set out at paragraph AA4.(2), I find that the existing accommodation within the roof space of the dwelling cannot be considered as an additional storey above the original dwellinghouse.

    To that end, it is therefore considered that the proposal meets with all the requirements as set out in Schedule 2, Part 1, Class AA of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended).

    I also note that the Council have considered the relevant matters of prior approval in their officers’ report and have concluded that the proposal would be acceptable in terms of its external appearance, amenity considerations, air traffic/defence assets and protected views. I also concur with the Councils assessment in these respects.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    The Council has provided as list of suggested conditions in the event that the appeal is allowed. However, these conditions duplicate the standard conditions as a set out in the GPDO and as such it is not necessary for me to impose in my decision. That said, in order for the proposal to benefit from the permitted development rights set out in the GPDO, all of the standard conditions set out at paragraphs AA.2 (2) and AA.2 (3)(b)-(e) must be complied with.

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion and Recommendation

    For the reasons given above and having had regard to all other matters raised, I recommend that the appeal should be allowed, and prior approval should be granted. Ifeanyi Chukwujekwu APPEALS PLANNING OFFICER

  8. Section 09

    Inspector’s Decision

    I have considered all the submitted evidence and my representative’s report and on that basis the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 2894No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    8 November 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    25 July 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3319688
Application reference
23/0500M
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Cheshire East
Planning authority code
E06000049

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
3. Refused prior approval of permitted development rights
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
31 March 2023
Valid date
31 March 2023
Start date
11 July 2023
Planning authority decision date
30 March 2023
Appeal decision date
8 November 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
41616
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21