Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3320054

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a loft conversion with front dormer window.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a loft conversion with front dormer window at [site address] , Eltham, Greenwich [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application 22/3882/HD, dated 19 November 2022, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: CRR/G41/003 Rev P8, CRR/G41/004 Rev P8 and CRR/G41/005 Rev P8

    The materials to be used in the construction of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the terrace of which it forms part and that of the local area.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal dwelling is a two storey end of terrace house located at the junction of Green Lane and Cambridge Green. The terrace is curved in plan and is set behind a shared green space that opens onto both streets. The front and main entrance to the appeal dwelling faces onto Cambridge Green. This layout is mirrored in the terrace on the other side of Cambridge Green.

    The proposed loft extension involves a roof light to the roof slope facing Green Lane and the addition of a traditionally formed tile hung dormer window with pitched roof, which would be added to the hipped roof slope of the appeal Appeal Decision APP/E5330/D/23/332005 4 dwelling facing Cambridge Green. The proposed dormer window would be centrally positioned, reflecting the existing symmetry of the front elevation, centring on the main entrance. It would be set down from the roof ridge and from the sides of the roof slope and would be set slightly away from the eaves.

    Due to the modest scale of the proposed dormer window and that it would be set in from the perimeter edges of the roof slope into which it would sit, it would appear to be a proportionate and subordinate addition to the appeal dwelling. The proposed materials and the detailed design for the dormer window would match those of the existing dwelling. As such, it would not appear unduly dominating or prominent.

    The appellant has drawn my attention to an existing dormer window to [address], a similar end of terrace house at the end of the opposite terrace, which faces onto Green Lane. Similar to this existing dormer window, the proposal would, in immediate and wider views, appears as a complimentary addition to its host dwelling and would not appear unduly prominent or dominant to the appeal dwelling or to the terrace of which it forms part. I have, therefore, given this considerable weight in my considerations.

    Whilst the Royal Borough of [name] and Conversions Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018) sets out that generally the Council will not grant planning permission for extensions on front facing roof slopes, this is design advice and guidance that should be applied to individual circumstances and development proposals. For the reasons given above, I find that that the proposal would preserve the existing appearance in terms of height, scale and visual interest and would accord with this guidance.

    As such, the proposal would not result in any harm to the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling, the terrace of which it forms part or to that of the local area. As such it would accord with policy DH1 and DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: [name] (2014), policy D3 of the London Plan (2021) and paragraphs 130 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021). These collectively seek to ensure that development, including extensions, demonstrate high quality design and integrate with the local area.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    I have included the standard condition relating to the timing of the implementation of development, and to ensure design quality I have attached a condition requiring compliance with approved plans and a condition requiring that materials used match those of the existing building.

  5. Section 06

    Conclusion

    The appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 209No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    15 August 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    27 July 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3320054
Application reference
22/3882/HD
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Planning authority code
E09000011

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
7 April 2023
Valid date
7 April 2023
Start date
20 June 2023
Planning authority decision date
16 January 2023
Appeal decision date
15 August 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
37171
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21