Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3320412

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

erection of a garage/home office outbuilding.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for garage/home office outbuilding at [site address] , [site address] , Purleigh, Essex [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 22/01072/HOUSE dated 12 October 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plan: 2226/001 [name] - Site Location Plan, 2226/200 [name] - Proposed Block Plan, 2226/202 [name] - Proposed Floor Plan and Roof Plan; and 2226/203 [name] - [name].

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the hereby approved development shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    Procedural Matter

    At the time of my site visit, the development had been commenced. The application form made clear that the scheme had been submitted retrospectively however had yet to be completed and I have dealt with the appeal on that basis.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The site is located within a rural setting within the open countryside with properties sporadically lining [site address] within the immediate area. The appeal site is an ‘L-shaped’ barn conversion surrounded by fields to the north and west, a residential property with outbuildings to the east and [site address] to the south. There is a harmony to the pattern of development and palette of materials used in the immediate area.

    Whilst the development is located to the rear of the site behind the existing property and screened to a degree by fencing, it is visible from the road and the open fields beyond. Notwithstanding this the low height, combined with the use of weatherboarding provide a rural appearance and assimilate the outbuilding with the existing property.

    In combination the outbuildings adjacent the site form part of the character of the rural setting. The development would therefore not appear stark or urban within the area. I find that the development would not harm the character and appearance of the area.

    I conclude that the development would not harm the character and appearance of the existing property and the area in general. There is no conflict with Policies D1, H4, S1 and S8 of the Maldon District Approved Local Development Plan 2014-2029 (2017) which amongst other things seeks to ensure developments are subordinate to the existing property, maintain the rural character of an area.

    I also find no conflict with the National Planning Policy Framework (2021) which seeks to ensure good design of developments.

  5. Section 06

    Other Matters

    The Council contend that the development is in breach of planning conditions attached to previous approvals relating to restricting permitted development rights and also landscaping to be carried out. Even so, my findings demonstrate that the development is acceptable.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion and Conditions

    For the above reasons I conclude that this appeal should be allowed.

    I have attached a plans condition as this provides certainty. I have also added conditions concerning materials to ensure a satisfactory appearance.

    A standard time limit condition is not necessary as the development has already commenced.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 126No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    18 September 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    21 August 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3320412
Application reference
22/01072/HOUSE
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Maldon District Council
Planning authority code
E07000074

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
122 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
14 April 2023
Valid date
14 April 2023
Start date
5 July 2023
Planning authority decision date
2 March 2023
Appeal decision date
18 September 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
38893
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21