Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3321181

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

6 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

a ground floor single storey rear extension, with internal alterations and roof lights.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a ground floor single storey rear extension, with internal alterations and roof lights at [site address] , Hillingdon [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 58975/APP/2023/392, dated 10 February 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 01, 02, 03, 04, 06, 07 and 08.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development shall match those used in the existing building.

  2. Section 03

    [name]

    The main issues are: • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and • whether the occupants of the host property would experience appropriate living conditions having regard to the availability of outdoor amenity space.

  3. Section 04

    Character and appearance

    The host property sits at the end of a terrace, and is prominently located at the junction of [address] and [address]. Whilst relatively modern, its siting, form, design, and pebble-dashed finish reflect the characteristics of the older properties which prevail in the area. That said, it projects slightly further to the rear at two storeys high compared to most of the other properties in this row.

    The proposed extension would have a limited depth, and a modest single storey height with a shallow pitched roof, such that it would appear clearly subordinate to the host. Only the uppermost part of it would be visible in the streetscene above the boundary fence. It would also be finished with matching pebbledash and red/brown tiles, which would help to integrate it with the host and with its surroundings.

    A significant gap would be retained between the rear face of the proposed extension and the large outbuilding at the end of the host’s rear garden, which is itself only just visible from the highway above the fence. Consequently, the scheme would not appear cramped on the plot. Finally, I also observed that some nearby properties on corner plots have single storey rear projections, including opposite this site at [address], and at [address].

    For these reasons, the scheme would not harm the character and appearance of the area. It would not therefore conflict with Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two: Development Management Policies (2020) (‘HLPP2’) which, amongst other things, requires development to be designed to the highest standards, and to harmonise with its context, taking account of matters such as scale, mass, bulk and plot coverage.

    Neither would it conflict with HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1’s broad requirement for extensions to appear subordinate to the main dwelling, and to avoid an adverse impact on the character, appearance and quality of the street and the area, having regard to cumulative impacts.

  4. Section 05

    Living conditions

    [name] vi) of HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1 states that extensions should ensure that adequate garden space is retained, but it does not provide any quantitative or qualitative measures.

    According to the Council’s calculations, the scheme would leave approximately 45sqm of amenity space for the occupiers. That space would be relatively private and, with its south-easterly aspect, would benefit from good natural light. It would therefore provide the occupants with appropriate space to sit outside and relax, play, or to perform typical outdoor domestic tasks such as hanging laundry. The scheme would thus provide suitable living conditions for the occupiers, and it would not conflict with HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions and Conclusion

    Turning to the matter of conditions, I have imposed the standard time limit for commencement and, in the interests of certainty, a condition requiring that the development be carried out in accordance with the approved plans. Finally, in the interests of good design, a matching materials condition is necessary.

    Summing up, the scheme would not harm the character and appearance of the area, and it would provide the occupants with appropriate living conditions. Consequently, having regard to all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 450No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    6 September 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    17 August 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3321181
Application reference
58975/APP/2023/392
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Planning authority code
E09000017

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
27 April 2023
Valid date
9 May 2023
Start date
4 August 2023
Planning authority decision date
4 April 2023
Appeal decision date
6 September 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
38204
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21