Appeal 3321181
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
a ground floor single storey rear extension, with internal alterations and roof lights.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a ground floor single storey rear extension, with internal alterations and roof lights at [site address] , Hillingdon [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 58975/APP/2023/392, dated 10 February 2023, subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 01, 02, 03, 04, 06, 07 and 08.
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development shall match those used in the existing building.
Section 03
[name]
The main issues are: • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area; and • whether the occupants of the host property would experience appropriate living conditions having regard to the availability of outdoor amenity space.
Section 04
Character and appearance
The host property sits at the end of a terrace, and is prominently located at the junction of [address] and [address]. Whilst relatively modern, its siting, form, design, and pebble-dashed finish reflect the characteristics of the older properties which prevail in the area. That said, it projects slightly further to the rear at two storeys high compared to most of the other properties in this row.
The proposed extension would have a limited depth, and a modest single storey height with a shallow pitched roof, such that it would appear clearly subordinate to the host. Only the uppermost part of it would be visible in the streetscene above the boundary fence. It would also be finished with matching pebbledash and red/brown tiles, which would help to integrate it with the host and with its surroundings.
A significant gap would be retained between the rear face of the proposed extension and the large outbuilding at the end of the host’s rear garden, which is itself only just visible from the highway above the fence. Consequently, the scheme would not appear cramped on the plot. Finally, I also observed that some nearby properties on corner plots have single storey rear projections, including opposite this site at [address], and at [address].
For these reasons, the scheme would not harm the character and appearance of the area. It would not therefore conflict with Policy DMHB 11 of the Hillingdon Local Plan Part Two: Development Management Policies (2020) (‘HLPP2’) which, amongst other things, requires development to be designed to the highest standards, and to harmonise with its context, taking account of matters such as scale, mass, bulk and plot coverage.
Neither would it conflict with HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1’s broad requirement for extensions to appear subordinate to the main dwelling, and to avoid an adverse impact on the character, appearance and quality of the street and the area, having regard to cumulative impacts.
Section 05
Living conditions
[name] vi) of HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1 states that extensions should ensure that adequate garden space is retained, but it does not provide any quantitative or qualitative measures.
According to the Council’s calculations, the scheme would leave approximately 45sqm of amenity space for the occupiers. That space would be relatively private and, with its south-easterly aspect, would benefit from good natural light. It would therefore provide the occupants with appropriate space to sit outside and relax, play, or to perform typical outdoor domestic tasks such as hanging laundry. The scheme would thus provide suitable living conditions for the occupiers, and it would not conflict with HLPP2 Policy DMHD 1.
Section 06
Conditions and Conclusion
Turning to the matter of conditions, I have imposed the standard time limit for commencement and, in the interests of certainty, a condition requiring that the development be carried out in accordance with the approved plans. Finally, in the interests of good design, a matching materials condition is necessary.
Summing up, the scheme would not harm the character and appearance of the area, and it would provide the occupants with appropriate living conditions. Consequently, having regard to all other matters raised, the appeal is allowed.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 450No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 6 September 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 17 August 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3321181
- Application reference
- 58975/APP/2023/392
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Planning authority code
- E09000017
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 27 April 2023
- Valid date
- 9 May 2023
- Start date
- 4 August 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 6 September 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 38204
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21