Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3322940

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

rear and side extensions to existing detached house.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for rear and side extensions to existing detached house at [site address] , Surrey, [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2023/00693, dated 6 September 2022, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with following approved plans: Location Plan; [name] [name]; [name] [name].

    The extension hereby permitted shall not be occupied until the window at the eastern side elevation serving the first-floor ensuite bathroom has been fitted with obscured glazing, and no part of that window that is less than 1.7 metres above the floor of the room in which it is installed shall be capable of being opened. Details of the type of obscured glazing shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the window is installed and once installed the obscured glazing shall be retained thereafter.

  2. Section 03

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of occupiers of [address], with particular regard to outlook, light and privacy.

  3. Section 04

    Reasons

    The appeal site relates to a 2 storey detached house with an attached half hipped roof garage. The rear building line extends slightly further back than the neighbouring house, No 24, which has ground floor windows and a first floor window facing the side elevation of the appeal property. Paths along the side of both houses provide a significant gap between them.

    The proposal includes a 2 storey rear extension which would increase the living room and dining area on the ground floor and provide an additional ensuite bedroom on the first floor. A first floor window is proposed on the side of the house to serve an existing bedroom which would lose its rear facing window. The Council is concerned that this window would enable views into a bedroom window on the side wall of No 24, leading to a loss of privacy, and that the extension would reduce light to, and have an overbearing impact when viewed from, the other side windows on the ground floor of No 24.

    I note that the proposed rear extension would be closer to the boundary with No 24 than the minimum 3 metre distance suggested in the Waverley Borough Council Residential Extensions Supplementary Planning Document (2010) (SPD). Nonetheless, the distance between the side walls of the extension and those of No 24 would exceed 3 metres because of the gaps between the houses and the boundary wall.

    The ground floor side windows at No 24 face directly onto the side wall of the appeal property. As a result, the outlook from, and light into, these windows is already restricted. However, the room they serve receives most of its light and unrestricted views from a rear window which overlooks the garden and receives sunlight for much of the day because of its southeast orientation. Whilst the proposed extension would reduce the outlook from the side windows, it would not significantly reduce light to, or encroach on views from, the rear window because of its orientation and distance from the boundary with the appeal property.

    The side wall of No 24 is stepped and its first floor bedroom window is located next to the corner where the wall projects forward of it. This wall would almost completely block views between the proposed new bedroom window on the appeal property and the first floor bedroom at No 24. The proposed development would not therefore lead to significant overlooking between these 2 bedrooms.

    Overall, I am satisfied that the proposed development would not harm the living conditions of occupiers of No 24 and there would be no conflict with Policy TD1 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part 1 (2018), Policies FNP1 and FNP16 of the Farnham Neighbourhood Plan 2020, Policies DM1 and DM5 of the Waverley Borough Local Plan Part 2 (2023) and the objectives of the SPD which seek high quality development which avoids harm to the amenity of occupants of nearby residences.

  4. Section 05

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard condition which limits the lifespan of the planning permission I have specified the approved plans to provide certainty and imposed a condition regarding materials to safeguard the character and appearance of the area. I have included a condition requiring obscured glass for the ensuite bathroom, as suggested by the Council, which is necessary to prevent overlooking and ensure mutual privacy between occupiers of the appeal property and No 28. The suggested condition preventing the use of the ground floor flat roofed extension as a balcony or roof garden is not necessary as no access to the roof is proposed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 128No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted site visit dates
    26 September 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3322940
Application reference
WA/2023/00693
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Waverley Borough Council
Planning authority code
E07000216

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
63 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
25 May 2023
Valid date
1 June 2023
Start date
8 August 2023
Planning authority decision date
10 May 2023
Appeal decision date
12 October 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
40169
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21