Appeal 3323078
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.
Section 02
Procedural Matter
The Council has described the development as “First floor rear extension, insertion of first floor side window and alterations to first floor rear fenestration”. This more accurately describes the whole development.
Section 03
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for first floor rear extension, insertion of first floor side window and alterations to first floor rear fenestration at [site address] under ref: 3/23/0418/HH dated 26 February 2023 and subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.
This permission shall relate to the following approved plans: 1:1250 (site location plan), 1:500 (block plan) and DB/GN/100/Rev.I (existing and proposed plans).
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used on the existing dwelling.
The proposed first floor window opening in the side (west) elevation as indicated on drawing ref: DB/GN/100/Rev.I shall be permanently fitted with obscure glazing to a minimum degree of obscurity level 3 and non-opening up to 1.7 metres from the finished floor level of the room it serves.
Section 04
Main Issue
The main issue is the impact on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal site comprises a modern semi-detached property located in a small cul-de-sac of similar properties. It lies on the northern edge of the small village of Eastwick which itself is located in open countryside to the north west of Harlow. There is an existing single storey extension to the rear and side of the dwelling.
Permission was granted in October 2022 for a single storey side extension and first floor rear extension incorporating rear Juliet balcony, first floor side window and alterations to existing single storey flat roof at the property.1 The current appeal scheme is similar to this approved scheme but proposes a larger first floor rear extension.
The proposed first floor extension would be above the single storey rear addition and extend across much of the width of the dwelling. It would be about 1 metre wider than the first floor element permitted under the above permission but would have the same depth. Whilst this would result in a larger addition, it would not be readily visible from the street scene or from any public viewpoint within the wider area. The increased size of extension would add more bulk to the dwelling but not to such a significant degree as to be unacceptable. The ridge would not extend above the main ridge height and, overall, I consider that the scale and mass of the proposal would remain appropriate to the host dwelling and be subservient in appearance.
The increased size of the first floor extension would bring it closer to the attached neighbouring property but this would not be significantly more harmful when compared to the approved scheme.
I therefore find that the proposal would not be harmful to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and wider area. It would thereby accord with Policies HOU11 and DES4 of the East Herts District Plan (2018) which seek to ensure that development is of a high standard of design to reflect and promote local distinctiveness, that respects or improves upon the character of a site and that extensions to dwellings are of a size, scale, mass, form, siting, design and materials appropriate to the character, appearance and setting of the existing dwelling and surrounding area, and should also generally appear as a subservient addition to the dwelling.
Section 06
Conclusions
Conditions to ensure that the development accords with the approved plans and that the materials used in the construction of the external faces of the extension match those of the host dwelling are necessary in the interests of proper planning and visual amenity. A condition to ensure that the new first floor side window is obscurely glazed and non-opening is also required to protect the privacy of the occupiers of the adjoining dwelling.
I therefore conclude that this appeal should be allowed and planning permission granted.
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 482No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 2 October 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 1 August 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3323078
- Application reference
- 3/23/0418/HH
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Planning authority code
- E07000242
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Planning Appeals - Full
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- No
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 26 May 2023
- Valid date
- 26 May 2023
- Start date
- 29 June 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 28 April 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 2 October 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- No
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 39579
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21