Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3326956

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

single storey side/rear extension.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a single storey side/rear extension at [site address] , [site address] , Newchurch, Isle of Wight [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/00888/HOU, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the conditions in the attached schedule.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    An updated version of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) was published in December 2023. Its content is largely unchanged in relation to the main issues of this appeal, so I have not sought the views of the main parties on this matter.

    [name] 2023, the National Landscapes Association reported that all designated Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) had become National Landscapes. However, the Framework continues to refer to them as AONBs. In this decision I have used the term AONB, consistent with the evidence and the Framework. The legal designation and policy status of such areas is unaffected, whichever term is used.

    Since the application was refused a Tree Preservation Order, 23/00021/TPO, protecting three oak trees in the rear garden of Rowan, a neighbouring house to the appeal site, has come into force.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area particularly the effect on trees.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal site is a detached house in a large garden in an area of similar properties. It is in the Isle of [name]. In accordance with the Framework great weight must be given to conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty of AONBs, which have the highest status of protection in relation to these issues.

    The house has a substantial front garden and is at a higher level than the shared access track. The proposed small, single storey, wrap around extension would be to the side and rear of the house. It would be of acceptable design and would not be intrusive in views from the street or neighbouring properties. Due to its size and position it would not detract from the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB.

    The area is attractive and verdant because of the many mature trees and shrubs in gardens around the houses and nearby woodlands. Although there are trees within the appeal site none are near to the proposed extension. The group of protected trees at Rowan are close to the shared boundary. Branches of the nearest oak tree spread over part of the garden of [address] and some reach its roof.

    The protected trees are mature attractive specimens and their canopies can be seen from the surrounding area between houses and above roofs. Together and individually they add significant value to the verdant and attractive character of the local area.

    The tree nearest to the proposed extension has been pruned in the past and its branches are well above the patio such that no works are necessary to the tree to enable the extension to be constructed. An appropriate foundation design would be sufficient to mitigate any effect on tree roots and downpipe/gutter protection would reduce any nuisance arising from tree litter.

    Trees are living plants so they cannot be managed in ways that are wholly free from risk or the need for maintenance. The proposed extension would be beneath the branches of the oak tree. As a result there could be fears of the potential for damage to property or people from falling branches. However, this is not significantly different to any such fears which might arise in respect of the risk in relation to the existing patio. I see no reason to suppose that such risk could not be managed in the future by appropriate pruning that did not adversely affect the appearance or health of the tree albeit such works would need to be adequately justified.

    I conclude the proposal would not have a harmful effect on nearby trees and would have an acceptable effect on the character and appearance of the area. The proposal would not harm the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB. [name] find no conflict with Policies DM2 or DM12 of the Island Plan Core Strategy 2012, which amongst other things, seek to optimise the potential of a site but have regard to existing constraints such as trees and to conserve enhance and promote the landscape of the Island. Nor do I find conflict with the aims of the Isle of Wight Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plan 2019 – 2024 in seeking to conserve and enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the AONB.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    I have considered the conditions put forward by the Council and the details proposed by the appellants in the light of the tests in the Framework and the Planning Policy Guidance. Where appropriate I have amended the wording of conditions to reflect the guidance.

    Compliance with the submitted plans and a time scale for implementation are necessary for certainty.

    An Arboricultural Method Statement setting out excavation methods, foundation design, tree protection measures and downpipe/gutter protection is required to minimise the effect on protected trees. These details are required prior to the commencement of development to ensure the protection of the trees from damage during construction and to ensure that the extension is appropriately constructed to protect the health of the trees and the character and appearance of the area. The appellants do not object to the proposed

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    For the reasons set out above the appeal should be allowed.

  7. Section 08

    Schedule of Conditions

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans BDS338/300 and TCP/S/01.

    No preparatory work or development shall take place until an [name] in relation to the protected oak trees at Rowan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. This shall include: a) details of the means of excavation and foundation design of the proposed extension incorporating measures to minimise impact on tree roots; b) details of the means to minimise the potential impact on the trees during construction works, including details of protective tree fencing to be installed for the duration of construction works; c) details of downpipe and gutter protection measures to minimise nuisance from tree litter. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved [name] and the downpipe and gutter protection measures shall be retained thereafter. End of Schedule

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 508No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    2 May 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    22 April 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3326956
Application reference
23/00888?hou
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Isle of Wight Council
Planning authority code
E06000046

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Unknown
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
15 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Yes
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
31 July 2023
Valid date
13 August 2023
Start date
17 October 2023
Planning authority decision date
13 July 2023
Appeal decision date
2 May 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Yes
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
50364
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21