Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3328224

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

8 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

No verified development description has been extracted from an official decision PDF yet.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of a new outbuilding to replace demolished garage at [site address] , Totland, Isle of Wight [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref: 23/00703/HOU, dated 19 April 2023, subject to the following

  2. Section 03

    conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than 3 years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 20:2126:8.

    No development shall commence until details of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the proposal hereby permitted have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and retained thereafter.

    No development shall commence until there shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority a scheme of landscaping. The scheme shall include an [name] indicating all existing trees and hedgerows on the land, identifying those to be retained and setting out measures for their protection throughout the course of development. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of landscaping shall be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the occupation of the buildings or the completion of the development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or plants which within a period of 5 years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of similar size and species. _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

  3. Section 04

    [name]

    The main issues are the effect of the proposal on a) the character and appearance of the area; and b) living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring houses with regard to privacy and outlook.

  4. Section 05

    Character and appearance

    The appeal site relates to a semi-detached house on [address] in a predominantly residential area. The land slopes down towards the adjacent dwelling known as Hillcrest.

    The front boundary consists of mature vegetation for much of its length, such that the property is only evident from the public domain from a broadly north-easterly direction. Approaching the site along the highway, the appeal building would be visible behind the trees and shrubs in the foreground that would provide some partial screening. Despite its elevated position, to my mind it would be of modest scale and height, and appear as a subservient structure to the host dwelling.

    I observed a number of outbuildings within other domestic curtilages in the area, and in this context I am of the view that the development would not be incongruous. I am also aware that the scheme would replace a detached garage that has been demolished; historically an outbuilding served the property in this location and this adds further weight to my findings.

    I conclude that the proposal would harmonise with the character and appearance the area. It would meet with policy DM2 of the Island Plan Core Strategy 2012 (CS), which seeks to secure new development of acceptable scale and appearance.

  5. Section 06

    Living conditions

    The new outbuilding would be afforded a view over the blank side elevation, front garden and driveway of Hillcrest. No private areas of the adjacent curtilage would be overlooked, and as such I consider that there would be no adverse loss of privacy.

    I therefore find that the proposal would not result in harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring houses with regard to privacy. The scheme would be in accordance with policy DM2 of the CS, which requires new development to have regard to adjacent buildings.

  6. Section 07

    Conditions

    I have considered the imposition of conditions in light of advice in Planning Policy Guidance and the Framework. In addition to the standard implementation condition, the approved plans are listed for certainty.

    Conditions requiring submission of external materials and a scheme of soft landscaping for planting on the slope would provide for a satisfactory appearance. Arboricultural protection and supervision can be secured to ensure retention of local trees. _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________

  7. Section 08

    Conclusion

    Based on the foregoing, I allow the appeal.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 212No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    4 December 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    23 November 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3328224
Application reference
23/00703/HOU
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Isle of Wight Council
Planning authority code
E06000046

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
33 m²
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
No
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
22 August 2023
Valid date
22 August 2023
Start date
8 November 2023
Planning authority decision date
15 June 2023
Appeal decision date
4 December 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
42915
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21