Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3328375

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

7 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of outbuilding and associated works.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of outbuilding and associated works at [site address] , Soham, Cambridgeshire [postcode] in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 23/00483/FUL, dated 19 April 2023, subject to the following conditions:

    The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision.

    The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: P – 5018 – 01 and P – 5018 - 02.

  2. Section 03

    Preliminary Matters

    An outbuilding is under construction at the site and whilst it appears to be the outbuilding that is the subject of the appeal, it has not yet been completed. I have proceeded with the appeal based on the submitted drawings.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area.

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    The appeal site consists of a detached bungalow within a row of dwellings. Beyond the tall and established hedgerow that forms the rear boundaries are open fields. The fields extend across the rear of properties fronting The Butts and Cherry Tree Lane. There are outbuildings to the rear of properties, including a metal building at No 137a The Butts.

    The building would be to the rear of the dwelling at No [site address] (No 135), close to the rear boundary. The scale and position of the building would respect the dominance of the dwelling at No 135 and restricts the visual effect within the street scene of The Butts and Cherry Tree Lane. The building is stated to house the appellant’s motorhome and would be the minimum size necessary to accommodate the vehicle.

    The roof would be visible above the hedgerow as viewed from the public right of way that crosses the adjoining field. Whilst projecting above the hedgerow, the roof would be seen within the context of the surrounding development, including the dwellings to either side of the site and their outbuildings. The proposed green box profile sheeting to the roof would allow the building to blend with its surroundings and soften its visual effect. Although box profile sheeting is uncommon for domestic outbuildings, it is typically used in rural locations, including on buildings in the vicinity of the site, and its use in this instance would therefore be acceptable.

    I conclude that the proposal would not harm the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area. The development therefore accords with Policies ENV1 and ENV2 of the East Cambridgeshire Local Plan and the [name], which require proposals to be designed to a high quality, enhancing and complementing local distinctiveness.

  5. Section 06

    Conditions

    In addition to the standard time limit condition, I have imposed a condition requiring that the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans. This is in the interests of certainty.

  6. Section 07

    Conclusion

    The proposal would accord with the development plan as a whole and there are no material considerations, which would indicate that a decision should be made otherwise. For the reasons given I conclude that the appeal is allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 20880No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    24 November 2023Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    30 October 2023 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3328375
Application reference
23/00483/FUL
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
East Cambridgeshire District Council
Planning authority code
E07000009

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
24 August 2023
Valid date
24 August 2023
Start date
4 October 2023
Planning authority decision date
3 August 2023
Appeal decision date
24 November 2023

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
No
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
42552
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21