Skip to main content
Official casework recordAllowedCurrent release

Appeal 3329243

Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.

A clearer next step

See how Inspectors approached issues like yours

Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.

  • See which issues the decision appears to turn on
  • Compare the facts and open the full appeal records

One private comparison

How the refusal review works

One-off service · No subscription

Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.

Official decision document

The decision, section by section

5 sections

Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.

Section 01

Development description

the erection of a 1.8m wooden fence following removal of existing hedge.

  1. Section 02

    Decision

    The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of a 1.8m wooden fence following removal of existing hedge at [site address] , Shropshire, [postcode] , in accordance with the terms of the application, [name]/2023/0437, dated 20 April 2023, and the plans submitted with it, subject to the following condition:

    The fence hereby approved shall be painted or stained in a colour in accordance with details submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such details shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority within 3 months of the date of this approval and shall include a schedule of works indicating when the works will be completed. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the fence harmonises with the appearance of [site address] and the surrounding area.

  2. Section 03

    Procedure

    The retrospective nature of this appeal does not affect the manner in which the planning issues have been considered.

  3. Section 04

    Main Issue

    The main issue is the effect of the disputed fence on the character and appearance of the local street scene, including nearby Local Interest Buildings (LIBs).

  4. Section 05

    Reasons

    [site address] is a relatively modern detached house standing on a corner site north of the LIB, [address] that fronts [site address] , and west of a mature traditional dwelling, No2 [address]. Immediately further east is the LIB, [address], set back from the road.

    The frontages of both [site address] and [address] are largely open-plan in character but with significant amounts of vegetation softening their overall appearance.

    The disputed 1.8m fence encloses the side and rear garden of [site address] , being set back a little from its flank boundary with [address], forming a landscape strip which has been planted with a row of low bushes.

    Notwithstanding the concern of the Council, I consider that the fence is too remote from the two LIBs to have any significant direct adverse impact upon their settings, character or appearance. However, the presence of those properties does emphasise the visibly high quality of the surrounding built development, interspersed with protected trees, albeit the latter are not sufficiently close to be directly affected by the fence.

    From inspection, it is from No2 [address] and from the equally mature and traditional property, [address], directly opposite, that the fence is most obvious as a prominent addition to the road frontage.

    I accept that, in its present state with no applied finish and, as yet, minimal planting to screen it, the 1.8m wooden fence appears as a harsh addition to the existing harmonious street scene, detrimental to its character and appearance.

    In time, however, the planted bushes are likely to grow to soften the impact of the fence considerably. Meanwhile, and into the longer term, if the fence were finished in a suitably subdued colour, I consider that, visually, it would become acceptably integrated into the street scene, avoiding significant harm to its character and appearance. This can be ensured by the imposition of a condition suggested without prejudice by the Council.

    I therefore conclude that, subject to the prompt implementation of that condition, the fence can be brought into compliance with the relevant Policies BE1 and BE6 of the adopted Telford and Wrekin Local Plan and thus with the development plan as a whole. Those policies together set design criteria to ensure good design to respect its context, enhance the environment and protect LIBs, and are essentially consistent with the National Planning Policy Framework. The appeal is therefore allowed.

Planning inspector and document dates

The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.

  • Appeal Decision

    Extracted inspector · page 1
    Inspector attribution ID 1576No official casework-database value to compare
    Extracted decision date · page 1
    11 March 2024Matches the official casework database
    Extracted site visit dates
    5 March 2024 (page 1)

Reference and authority

Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.

Case reference
3329243
Application reference
TWC/2023/0437
Lead case reference
Not recorded
Planning authority
Telford and Wrekin Council
Planning authority code
E06000020

Casework details

The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.

Casework type
Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development type
Householder developments
Appeal type reason
1. Refused planning permission
Appeal reason
Refusal
Type detail
Planning Appeals - Full
Jurisdiction
Transferred
Link status
Not Linked

Site and development

Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.

Site area
Not recorded
Floor space
Not recorded
Number of residences
0
Site in Green Belt
No
Agricultural holding
Not recorded
Affects setting of a listed building
Not recorded
Historic building grant made
Not recorded
Relates to a conservation area
Not recorded
Flooding is an issue
Not recorded
Site within an AONB
Not recorded
Site within an SSSI
Not recorded

Decision and dates

The published outcome and every imported case date.

Official decision
Allowed
Decision category
Allowed
Received date
10 September 2023
Valid date
10 September 2023
Start date
5 December 2023
Planning authority decision date
26 July 2023
Appeal decision date
11 March 2024

Case administration

Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.

Redetermined
No
Bespoke
Yes
Date recovered
Not recorded
Date not recovered or derecovered
Not recorded
Call-in date
Not recorded
Costs applied for
No
Enforcement grounds count
Not recorded
Enforcement grounds
Not recorded

Source and catalogue history

When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.

Source
Planning Inspectorate casework database
Source data system
Horizon
Dataset status
Current release
Catalogue record ID
47958
First seen
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Last seen
20 August 2026 at 16:27
Removed from release
Not recorded
Record created
20 August 2026 at 14:24
Record updated
24 August 2026 at 16:21