Appeal 3330207
Public case and site metadata stored from the official casework database, including fields that were empty in the source release.
A clearer next step
See how Inspectors approached issues like yours
Bring your planning decision into a private workspace. We separate the disputed points, then match them with source-located Inspector reasoning from similar appeals.
- See which issues the decision appears to turn on
- Compare the facts and open the full appeal records
One private comparison
How the refusal review worksOne-off service · No subscription
Similar appeals are evidence to inspect, not a prediction of your outcome.
Official decision document
The decision, section by section
6 sections
Read the development description and the Inspector’s text from the official decision PDF in source order. Source headings are retained where available. Personal and contact details are removed by an automated privacy filter; this is source material, not Rules for You analysis.
Section 01
Development description
a front and rear extension with a proposed new roof.
Section 02
Decision
The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for a front and rear extension with a proposed new roof at [site address] in accordance with the terms of the application Ref 23/0699, dated 6 June 2023 and in accordance with the conditions set out in the attached schedule.
Section 03
Main Issue
The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
Section 04
Procedural Matter
The Council, in its officer’s report and decision notice, is concerned with the proposed development’s front elevation. The Council does not raise any concerns in respect of the proposed rear extension.
Section 05
Reasons
The appeal property is a detached two storey dwelling located within a residential area along Broadway.
Broadway in this location is a wide, busy thoroughfare. Detached and semi-detached two storey dwellings, some with rooms at roof level, are set back from the pavement behind front gardens and/or parking areas. These factors, together with the presence of street trees set within pavements and the nearby presence of a sports field, provide for a green and spacious character.
During my site visit, I observed that many dwellings along Broadway in this location have been altered and or extended. This gives rise to a wide and varied appearance of dwellings.
Some dwellings along Broadway have a single gable, some have two gables and some have no gables but bays. Some roofs are gabled, some are pitched, some are hipped and some involve a mixture of styles. I also noted during my site visit the presence of both lean-to and flat roofs.
This notable variance in the appearance of dwellings comprises part of the character of the area. There is no fixed style and individual expression provides for an interesting variety of dwellings that contribute to and do not detract from, the overall character of place.
The proposal would involve the development of three slim gables to the front of the dwelling. I find that these gables would provide for an attractive sense of symmetry across the appeal property’s front façade, as well as for visual interest within the wider area. 10.Further to the above, I consider that the proposal would reflect the presence of gables elsewhere along the street, albeit within a different design approach, which itself would be reflective of the wide and varied appearance of dwellings in the area. 11.Given all of the above, I find that the proposal would provide for design innovation in a manner that would be sympathetic to local character. 12.The proposed development would not harm the character and appearance of the area and would not be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework, to UDP1 Policies GP2 and ENV32, or to the Council’s Designing Walsall SPD2 Supplementary Planning Document, which together amongst other things, seek to protect local character.
Section 06
Conclusion
The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision;
The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the development hereby permitted shall match those used in the existing building;
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: Site and Location Plan AL-001; Proposed First Floor Plan AL-005; Loft Plan AL-006; [name]-007; [name]-008; Roof Plan AL-009; Proposed Ground Floor Plan (erroneously titled as Proposed First Floor Plan) AL-011.
No occupation or use of the development hereby permitted shall commence until ground gas protection measures have been put in place and a competent person’s verification report has been submitted in writing to the local planning authority. The verification report shall include full details and specification of the ground gas protection measures installed and confirmation that all membranes and other equipment has been installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s requirements and [name] 8485:2015+A1:2019 as revised or amended from time to time. The gas membranes and equipment shall thereafter be retained for the lifetime of the development.
The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out otherwise than in accordance with the approved recommendations of the Preliminary Bat Roost Assessment and [name], dated 05/01/23 and the approved details shall thereafter be retained for the lifetime of the development.
Notwithstanding the approved Preliminary Bat Roost Assessment and [name], prior to commencement of the development hereby permitted all workers on the site shall be made aware that bats may be present and shall not undertake demolition works including the dismantling of roofs, soffits, gables or in the vicinity of cracks and crevices otherwise than with the use of hand tools. All roof tiles, flashings and ridge tiles to be removed shall be lifted carefully and the undersides examined for bat droppings. If during the demolition and construction period bats or evidence of bats or their roosts are found: i) bats shall not be handled or touched; ii) the vicinity of the roost shall be immediately reinstated; iii) no further works shall be carried out until the need for a Natural England licence has been established; iv) within one week of finding bats or evidence of bats or their roosts, a written report by the supervising ecologist, who shall be a person qualified in ecology and/or nature conservancy shall be submitted in writing to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The report shall record what was found and propose appropriate mitigation measures, including a timetable for their implementation; v) the development hereby permitted shall not be carried out or continue, otherwise than in accordance with the approved mitigation measures and the approved timetable throughout the period of construction. 3 of 3
Planning inspector and document dates
The official casework attribution is grouped under a one-way keyed hash and shown only by its local identifier. Decision-letter dates and page references are extracted by fixed first-page rules and checked against that authoritative record.
Appeal Decision
- Extracted inspector · page 1
- Inspector attribution ID 601No official casework-database value to compare
- Extracted decision date · page 1
- 13 December 2023Matches the official casework database
- Extracted site visit dates
- 1 December 2023 (page 1)
Reference and authority
Official identifiers and the planning authority recorded against this case.
- Case reference
- 3330207
- Application reference
- 23/0699
- Lead case reference
- Not recorded
- Planning authority
- Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
- Planning authority code
- E08000030
Casework details
The casework, procedure, development and linking details supplied by the official record.
- Casework type
- Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development type
- Householder developments
- Appeal type reason
- 1. Refused planning permission
- Appeal reason
- Refusal
- Type detail
- Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- Transferred
- Link status
- Not Linked
Site and development
Published appeal-site measurements and planning designations, without the withheld precise location fields.
- Site area
- Not recorded
- Floor space
- Not recorded
- Number of residences
- 0
- Site in Green Belt
- No
- Agricultural holding
- Not recorded
- Affects setting of a listed building
- Not recorded
- Historic building grant made
- Not recorded
- Relates to a conservation area
- Not recorded
- Flooding is an issue
- Not recorded
- Site within an AONB
- Not recorded
- Site within an SSSI
- Not recorded
Decision and dates
The published outcome and every imported case date.
- Official decision
- Allowed
- Decision category
- Allowed
- Received date
- 26 September 2023
- Valid date
- 6 October 2023
- Start date
- 13 November 2023
- Planning authority decision date
- 22 September 2023
- Appeal decision date
- 13 December 2023
Case administration
Published recovery, call-in, costs and enforcement information for this case.
- Redetermined
- No
- Bespoke
- No
- Date recovered
- Not recorded
- Date not recovered or derecovered
- Not recorded
- Call-in date
- Not recorded
- Costs applied for
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds count
- Not recorded
- Enforcement grounds
- Not recorded
Source and catalogue history
When this record appeared in the rolling official release and when the catalogue stored it.
- Source
- Planning Inspectorate casework database
- Source data system
- Horizon
- Dataset status
- Current release
- Catalogue record ID
- 43557
- First seen
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Last seen
- 20 August 2026 at 16:27
- Removed from release
- Not recorded
- Record created
- 20 August 2026 at 14:24
- Record updated
- 24 August 2026 at 16:21